Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099573›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Not all drugs are created equal: impaired future thinking in opiate, but not alcohol, users.

Ahmed A Moustafa, Alejandro N Morris, Jean Louis Nandrino, Błażej Misiak, Monika Szewczuk-Bogusławska, Dorota Frydecka, Mohamad El Haj

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Neurobehavioral Approach to Addiction: Implications for the Opioid Epidemic and the Psychology of Addiction.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ahmed A MoustafaSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. a.moustafa@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-273X
Alejandro N MorrisSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jean Louis NandrinoUniv. Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, UMR 9193, SCALab, Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, 59000, Lille, France.
Błażej MisiakDepartment of Genetics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Monika Szewczuk-BogusławskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Dorota FrydeckaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Mohamad El HajLaboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire (EA 4638), Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FRQatar University · QAWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic future thinking refers to the ability to travel forward in time to pre-experience an event. Although future thinking has been intimately linked with self and identity, to our knowledge, no prior research has compared episodic future thinking in populations with different substance use disorders. This study investigates whether there are differences in episodic future thinking between these alcohol and opiate users. The study recruited participants who were on the opiate substitution program (n = 31) and individuals who had been diagnosed with alcohol dependence (n = 21) from the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Drug and Health Services. Healthy controls (n = 23) were recruited via Royal Prince Alfred Hospital databases and the general community. Past and future thinking was measured using four cue words. After each cue word, participants rated their phenomenological experience (e.g. emotion, reliving experience). Results indicated that alcohol-dependent individuals performed significantly higher in episodic future thinking compared to opiate users. These findings indicate that not all substance use disorder groups share similar episodic thinking capabilities. Our results suggest that the self-projection component of rehabilitation programs may have to be tailored to the different episodic construction abilities found in substance use disorder groups.

Indexed as

ImaginationMemory, EpisodicThinkingAdultAlcoholismDrug UsersFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsYoung AdultAddictionAlcoholismEpisodic future thinkingHeroin use disorderSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID30099573
OpenAlexW2886867356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.