ArticleNeuroImage2018
Functional connectivity within the voice perception network and its behavioural relevance.
Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Voice perception reflects graded sensitivity to acoustic cues along the auditory hierarchy.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Article
- Investigating the role of executive function in brain responses to infant crying among new parents.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- Functional mapping of auditory responses to complex sounds under light anesthesia in rhesus macaques.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in language evolution: insights from comparative neuroscience.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Article
- Cortical-striatal brain network distinguishes deepfake from real speaker identity.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Mapping of facial and vocal processing in common marmosets with ultra-high field fMRI.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Visual Deprivation Alters Functional Connectivity of Neural Networks for Voice Recognition: A Resting-State fMRI Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Distinct functional levels of human voice processing in the auditory cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Hypersensitivity to passive voice hearing in hallucination proneness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Temporal Voice Areas are not "just" Speech Areas.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Comparative connectomics of the primate social brain.NeuroImage · 2021Review
- Functionally homologous representation of vocalizations in the auditory cortex of humans and macaques.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Auditory cortical micro-networks show differential connectivity during voice and speech processing in humans.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Basal ganglia and cerebellum contributions to vocal emotion processing as revealed by high-resolution fMRI.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Categorizing human vocal signals depends on an integrated auditory-frontal cortical network.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- FMRI-based identity classification accuracy in left temporal and frontal regions predicts speaker recognition performance.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Role of Unimodal Feedback Pathways in Gender Perception During Activation of Voice and Face Areas.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recognizing who is speaking is a cognitive ability characterized by considerable individual differences, which could relate to the inter-individual variability observed in voice-elicited BOLD activity. Since voice perception is sustained by a complex brain network involving temporal voice areas (TVAs) and, even if less consistently, extra-temporal regions such as frontal cortices, functional connectivity (FC) during an fMRI voice localizer (passive listening of voices vs non-voices) has been computed within twelve temporal and frontal voice-sensitive regions ("voice patches") individually defined for each subject (N = 90) to account for inter-individual variability. Results revealed that voice patches were positively co-activated during voice listening and that they were characterized by different FC pattern depending on the location (anterior/posterior) and the hemisphere. Importantly, FC between right frontal and temporal voice patches was behaviorally relevant: FC significantly increased with voice recognition abilities as measured in a voice recognition test performed outside the scanner. Hence, this study highlights the importance of frontal regions in voice perception and it supports the idea that looking at FC between stimulus-specific and higher-order frontal regions can help understanding individual differences in processing social stimuli such as voices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.