Trial reportOphthalmology2018
Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.
Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK)-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Donor Diabetes and 1-Year Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Success Rate: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Endothelial Cell Loss 1 Year After Successful DMEK in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density Is Associated with Late Endothelial Graft Failure after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.Ophthalmology · 2019Trial
- Effect of Graft Attachment Status and Intraocular Pressure on Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.American journal of ophthalmology · 2019Trial
- Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.JAMA ophthalmology · 2019Trial
- Factors Associated With Graft Rejection in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.American journal of ophthalmology · 2018Trial
- Ten-year outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Hong Kong: a retrospective cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Successful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study.Ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Microbial contamination of donor corneas and post-keratoplasty endophthalmitis: a comparison between Japanese and U.S. eye banks using cold storage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel single-cell level evaluation method for corneal endothelial cell function.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of DSAEK at a tertiary eye center in Saudi Arabia: a 15-year retrospective review.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Long-Term Outcome of Endothelial Keratoplasty Among Glaucoma Patients and the Risk of Prostaglandin Analogue (Latanoprost) Use on Graft Rejection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of recipient and donor factors on corneal graft clearance: insights from serial anterior segment optical coherence tomography.AJO international · 2025Article
- Effects of Cholesterol Metabolism on Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Review
- The donation-transplantation process and corneal graft failure: A case-control study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Graft Failure After Penetrating Keratoplasty in Eastern China from 2018 to 2021.Annals of transplantation · 2024Article
- Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection After Repeat Keratoplasty and Associated Rate of Graft Failure.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo associate donor, recipient, and operative factors with graft success 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS).
designCohort study within a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial.
participantsOne thousand ninety individuals (1330 study eyes) with a median age of 70 years undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94% of eyes) or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE; 6% of eyes).
methodsEyes undergoing DSAEK were randomized to receive a donor cornea with preservation time (PT) of 0 to 7 days (n = 675) or 8 to 14 days (n = 655). Donor, recipient, and operative parameters were recorded prospectively. Graft failure was defined as regraft for any reason, a graft that failed to clear by 8 weeks after surgery, or an initially clear graft that became and remained cloudy for 90 days. Failure in the first 8 weeks was classified further as primary donor failure or early failure, in the absence or presence of operative complications, respectively. Proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for graft failure.
main outcome measuresGraft success at 3 years.
resultsOne thousand two hundred fifty-one of 1330 grafts (94%) remained clear at 3 years and were considered successful. After adjusting for PT, tissue from donors with diabetes (RR, 2.35; 99% CI, 1.03-5.33) and operative complications (RR, 4.21; 99% CI, 1.42-12.47) were associated with increased risk for primary or early failure. Preoperative diagnosis of PACE (RR, 3.59; 99% CI, 1.05-12.24) was associated with increased risk for late failure by 3 years after surgery compared with Fuchs dystrophy. Graft success showed little variation among other factors evaluated, including donor age (RR, 1.19 per decade; 99% CI, 0.91-1.56 per decade), preoperative donor endothelial cell density (RR, 1.10 per 500 cells; 99% CI, 0.74-1.63 per 500 cells), graft diameter (RR, 1.22 per 1 mm; 99% CI, 0.39-3.76 per 1 mm), and injector use for graft insertion (RR, 0.92; 99% CI, 0.40-2.10).
conclusionsDescemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty success in the early and entire postoperative period is more likely when the donor did not have diabetes and was without operative complications and in the long-term postoperative period in recipients with Fuchs dystrophy compared with those with PACE. Mechanisms whereby diabetic donors and PACE recipients reduce the rate of graft success after DSAEK warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.