Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30098049›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Anticholinergic exposure and cognitive decline in older adults: effect of anticholinergic exposure definitions in a 3-year analysis of the multidomain Alzheimer preventive trial (MAPT) study.

Laurine Andre, Adeline Gallini, François Montastruc, Nicola Coley, Jean-Louis Montastruc, Bruno Vellas, Sandrine Andrieu, Virginie Gardette, MAPT/DSA study group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Anticholinergic Medication Burden Scales: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurine AndreUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-8014
Adeline GalliniUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.
François MontastrucUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.
Nicola ColeyUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.
Jean-Louis MontastrucUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-6001
Bruno VellasUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.
Sandrine AndrieuUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.
Virginie GardetteUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), France.
MAPT/DSA study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the present study was to assess the association between anticholinergic (atropinic) burden and cognitive decline in older adults over the course of 3 years.

methodsWe used data from Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT) study participants aged ≥70 years and at risk of cognitive decline. Cognitive function was assessed with a composite score [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) orientation, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, Category Naming Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test] at 12, 24 and 36 months. Participants declining by more than 0.236 points on the composite score (representing the lowest quintile of 1-year cognitive change) during any 1-year period were considered to have undergone cognitive decline. Anticholinergic exposure was defined by four methods for each of four anticholinergic scales (Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden, Anticholinergic Risk Scale, the Durán list). The association between cognitive decline and time-varying anticholinergic exposure [primary analysis using the Durán list and maximal anticholinergic score (0, 1 or 3)] was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Other cognitive decline definitions were used in sensitivity analyses.

resultsAt baseline, among 1396 patients included, 7.4-23.5% were exposed to anticholinergic agents, depending on the anticholinergic scale used. Sixty-four per cent of participants experienced cognitive decline during follow-up. Regardless of the anticholinergic scale/exposure measurement used, no significant association was observed with cognitive decline {primary analysis: compared with non-anticholinergic agent users, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95, 1.38] for anticholinergic score = 1; HR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.65, 1.30] for score = 3}. Results were stable in sensitivity analyses.

conclusionWe found no significant association between anticholinergic exposure and cognitive decline in older adults using anticholinergic scales and definitions of exposure.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlzheimer DiseaseCholinergic AntagonistsCognitionCognitive DysfunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuropsychological TestsTime FactorsCholinergic Antagonistsadverse drug reactionselderlyneurodegenerationpharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID30098049
PMCPMC6303211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.