ArticleNeurocritical care2019
Safety, Feasibility, and Efficiency of a New Cooling Device Using Intravenous Cold Infusions for Fever Control.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFever control plays a key role in therapy of patients with acute brain injury. The infusion of cold saline could serve as an alternative or additional method for targeted temperature management. However, it is difficult to estimate the amount of fluid required to achieve normothermia merely on the basis of body weight. There is no standardized load management regarding the administration of cold saline, and no closed-loop systems based on continuous temperature-controlled feedback are available. The primary purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a new automated fluid infusion system.
methodsTwelve patients with acute brain injury and febrile episodes were treated with the automated infusion device tempedy (seiratherm GmbH, Herzogenaurach, Germany). Patients were included if bladder temperature still was ≥ 37.9 °C after administration of antipyretic medication, cold washing solutions, and ice packs more than 2 h earlier. The efficacy was examined by measuring the time and amount of fluid needed to reach and maintain target temperature. Feasibility and safety were assessed based on recording any technical difficulties with the new device and the occurrence of clinical signs of fluid overload such as acute pulmonary edema, electrolyte disturbances, or acid-base dysfunction.
resultsThe mean time was 73 min (range from 15 to 330 min) and 1650 ml the mean amount of fluid (21.2 ml/kg; SD 28.5 ml/kg) to reach the target temperature. The mean total fluid balance to reach and maintain the target temperature in the first 12 h was 1350 ml (SD 1550 ml). In the first 12 h 89.4% of the time temperature values were in the target range (median 95.3%, range 83.8-10%). No clinical signs of fluid overload such as an acute pulmonary edema or device-related adverse events occurred.
conclusionTarget temperature management with the new automated infusion device is feasible. Although we provided first data regarding safety, further controlled randomized studies are needed to evaluate the long-time safety, as well as the best indications and timing for this cooling device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.