Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097977›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018

Engaging High-Need Patients in Intensive Outpatient Programs: A Qualitative Synthesis of Engagement Strategies.

Donna M Zulman, Colin W O'Brien, Cindie Slightam, Jessica Y Breland, David Krauth, Andrea L Nevedal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Types of Engagement Strategies to Engage High-Risk Patients in VA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Donna M ZulmanDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. dzulman@stanford.edu.
Colin W O'BrienSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Cindie SlightamCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Jessica Y BrelandCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
David KrauthCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Andrea L NevedalCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX002125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive outpatient programs address the complex medical, social, and behavioral needs of individuals who account for disproportionate healthcare costs. Despite their promise, the impact of these programs is often diminished due to patient engagement challenges (i.e., low rates of patient participation and partnership in care).

objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify intensive outpatient program features and strategies that increase high-need patient engagement in these programs.

designQualitative study.

participantsTwenty program leaders and clinicians from 12 intensive outpatient programs in academic, county, Veterans Affairs, community, and private healthcare settings. APPROACH: A questionnaire and semi-structured interviews were used to identify common barriers to patient engagement in intensive outpatient programs and strategies employed by programs to address these challenges. We used content analysis methods to code patient engagement barriers and strategies and to identify program features that facilitate patient engagement. KEY

resultsThe most common barriers to patient engagement in intensive outpatient programs included physical symptoms/limitations, mental illness, care fragmentation across providers and services, isolation/lack of social support, financial insecurity, and poor social and neighborhood conditions. Patient engagement strategies included concrete services to support communication and use of recommended services, activities to foster patient trust and relationships with program staff, and counseling to build insight and problem-solving capabilities. Program features that were identified as enhancing engagement efforts included: 1) multidisciplinary teams with diverse skills, knowledge, and personalities to facilitate relationship building; 2) adequate staffing and resources to handle the demands of high-need patients; and 3) a philosophy that permitted flexibility and patient-centeredness.

conclusionsPromising clinical, interpersonal, and population-based approaches to engaging high-need patients frequently deviate from standard practice and require creative and proactive staff with adequate time, resources, and flexibility to address patients' needs on patients' terms.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAmbulatory CareHealth PersonnelHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansPatient ParticipationSurveys and Questionnairescare managementpatient-centered carepatient engagementprimary carevulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID30097977
PMCPMC6206348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.