ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2019
I know that "Kiki" is angular: The metacognition underlying sound-shape correspondences.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confidence judgments, feelings of knowing and judgments of learning: Towards a common framework.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Comparing behavioural sampling methods in shelter dogs: implications for enrichment studies.Animal cognition · 2026Article
- The influence of iconicity and autistic traits on novel word learning: a cross-cultural investigation.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The Bouba-Kiki effect is predicted by sound properties but not speech properties.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Examining the automaticity and symmetry of sound-shape correspondences.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The influence of Bouba- and Kiki-like shape on perceived taste of chocolate pieces.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the ability of people to evaluate their confidence when making perceptual judgments concerning a classic crossmodal correspondence, the Bouba/Kiki effect: People typically match the "Bouba" sound to more rounded patterns and match the "Kiki" sound to more angular patterns instead. For each visual pattern, individual participants were more confident about their own matching judgments when they happened to fall in line with the consensual response regarding whether the pattern was rated as "Bouba" or "Kiki". Logit regression analyses demonstrated that participants' confidence ratings and matching judgments were predictable by similar regression functions. This implies that the consensus and confidence underlying the Bouba/Kiki effect are underpinned by a common process, whereby perceptual features in the patterns are extracted and then used to match the sound according to rules of crossmodal correspondences. Combining both matching and confidence measures potentially allows one to explore and quantify the strength of associations in human knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30097975What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.