ReviewAdvances in therapy2018
Prostate Cancer in Primary Care.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of novel urinary biomarker tests in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of PSA testing on secondary care costs in England and Wales: estimates from the Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP).BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- Prostate Cancer Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices by Medical Doctors in Portugal.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Article
- Green tea catechins and prostate cancer: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and safety: a narrative review.BMC cancer · 2026Review
- A four-miRNA serum panel as a diagnostic biomarker for prostate cancer: an exploratory and validation study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Unveiling rare metastasis in prostate cancer: The role of PSMA-PET and MRI in detecting penile involvement - A case report and literature review.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Combining tissue biomarkers with mpMRI to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. Analysis of 21 biomarkers in the PICTURE study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Mitigating bias in prostate cancer diagnosis using synthetic data for improved AI driven Gleason grading.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the efficacy of AMACR, ERG, and AR immunostains in prostatic adenocarcinoma and their association with novel grade groups.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2025Article
- Association between periodontal disease and prostate disease: a mini review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer using serologic indices, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and sound touch elastography parameters: a retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Masked Image Modeling Meets Self-Distillation: A Transformer-Based Prostate Gland Segmentation Framework for Pathology Slides.Cancers · 2024Article
- The Diagnostic Value of bpMRI in Prostate Cancer: Benefits and Limitations Compared to mpMRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prostate Cancer: A Review of Genetics, Current Biomarkers and Personalised Treatments.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Associations of HALP score with serum prostate-specific antigen and mortality in middle-aged and elderly individuals without prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with biomarkers for the diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy seen worldwide. The incidence has risen in recent decades, mainly fuelled by more widespread use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, although prostate cancer mortality rates have remained relatively static over that time period. A man's risk of prostate cancer is affected by his age and family history of the disease. Men with prostate cancer generally present symptomatically in primary care settings, although some diagnoses are made in asymptomatic men undergoing opportunistic PSA screening. Symptoms traditionally thought to correlate with prostate cancer include lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), such as nocturia and poor urinary stream, erectile dysfunction and visible haematuria. However, there is significant crossover in symptoms between prostate cancer and benign conditions affecting the prostate such as benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and prostatitis, making it very challenging to distinguish between them on the basis of symptoms. The evidence for the performance of PSA in asymptomatic and symptomatic men for the diagnosis of prostate cancer is equivocal. PSA is subject to false positive and false negative results, affecting its clinical utility as a standalone test. Clinicians need to counsel men about the risks and benefits of PSA testing to inform their decision-making. Digital rectal examination (DRE) by primary care clinicians has some evidence to show discrimination between benign and malignant conditions affecting the prostate. Patients referred to secondary care for diagnostic testing for prostate cancer will typically undergo a transrectal or transperineal biopsy, where a number of samples are taken and sent for histological examination. These biopsies are invasive procedures with side effects and a risk of infection and sepsis, and alternative tests such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are currently being trialled for their accuracy and safety in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.