Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097791›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Pupillary response: cognitive effort for breast cancer survivors.

Jamie S Myers, Melike Kahya, Melissa Mitchell, Junqiang Dai, Jianghua He, Sanghee Moon, Kevin Hamilton, Mary Valla, Anne O'Dea, Jennifer Klemp and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Neurocognitive efficiency in breast cancer survivorship: A performance monitoring ERP study.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jamie S MyersOffice of Grants and Research, University of Kansas School of Nursing, MS 4043, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. jmyers@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4582-9261
Melike KahyaDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Melissa MitchellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Junqiang DaiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Jianghua HeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Sanghee MoonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Kevin HamiltonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Mary VallaNorth Kansas City Hospital, 2750 Clay Edwards Drive, North Kansas City, MO, 64116, USA.
Anne O'DeaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Jennifer KlempUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, 2650 Shawnee Mission Pkwy, Westwood, KS, 66205, USA.
Monica KuryloDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Abiodun AkinwuntanDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Hannes DevosDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas School of Health Professions, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.

Funding

RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
Kansas University Training Program in Neurological and Rehabilitation SciencesT32HD057850 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jacob J. Sosnoff · 2009 to 2026
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000001NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD057850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this cross-sectional comparative pilot study was to evaluate cognitive effort, indexed by pupillary response (PR), for breast cancer survivors (BCS) with complaints of cognitive dysfunction following chemotherapy. STUDY

aimsCompare the cognitive effort employed by BCS to healthy controls (HC) during neuropsychological tests (NPT) for memory, sustained attention, verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, processing speed and executive function; and Investigate the relationship between PR-indexed cognitive effort and participants' self-report of cognitive function.

methodsSelf-report of cognitive function was collected from 23 BCS and 23 HC. PR was measured during NPT. Independent two-sample t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare group scores. Between-group effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated for each outcome. Correlation between mean self-report scores and PR values, as well as 95% confidence intervals, was calculated.

resultsNo group differences were demonstrated for NPT performance. BCS reported more issues with cognitive function than HC (p < .0001). A group effect for BCS was seen with PR-indexed cognitive effort for components of most NPT (p < .05). PR was correlated with most self-report measures of cognitive function (r = 0.33-0.45).

conclusionsPR sensitivity to cognitive effort across a variety of NPT and correlation with self-report of cognitive function was demonstrated. The portability, affordability, and "real-time" aspects of PR are attractive for potential use in the clinic setting to assess cognitive function. A larger study is needed to confirm these results. Prospective investigation of PR in BCS is needed to demonstrate sensitivity to cognitive function changes over time.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAdultAntineoplastic AgentsAttentionBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCase-Control StudiesCognitionCognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMemoryMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast cancerCognitive dysfunctionCognitive neurosciencePupillary response

Identifiers

PMID30097791
PMCPMC6882337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.