ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2019
Quantitative
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- ¹⁹F MRI radiomic features: in vitro and in vivo repeatability.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Review
- FirstTheranostics · 2023Article
- From In Vitro to Perioperative Vascular Tissue Engineering: Shortening Production Time by Traceable Textile-Reinforcement.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- The sensitivity of magnetic particle imaging and fluorine-19 magnetic resonance imaging for cell tracking.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Functional Imaging Using Fluorine (Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Protein-Engineered Nanoscale Micelles for DynamicACS nano · 2019Article
- Special issue on fluorine-19 magnetic resonance: technical solutions, research promises and frontier applications.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesA common limitation of all MATERIALS AND
methodsAdaptation of the previously introduced [Formula: see text] mapping technique to the problem of quantifying the
resultsA phantom experiment clearly shows that only compensation for both transmit and receive characteristics outperforms inaccurate quantification based on the non- or partly-corrected signal intensities. Furthermore, an optimized protocol is proposed for in vivo application.
conclusionThe proposed [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text] mapping technique represents a simple to implement and easy-to-use solution for quantification of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
30097741What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.