Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097726›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2018

Excellence in orthopaedic surgery: an overview of Nobel Prize nominees 1901-1960 with focus on Friedrich Pauwels and Gerhard Küntscher.

Nils Hansson

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Adolf Lorenz and the Lolita Armour Case.International orthopaedics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nils HanssonDepartment for the History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany. nils.hansson@hhu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis paper provides for the first time an overview of orthopaedic surgeons nominated for the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine during the first six decades of the twentieth century. The study is part of the project "Enacting Excellency: Nobel Prize nominations for surgeons 1901-1960".

methodsThe nomination letters were gathered in the archive of the Nobel Committee at the Karolinska Institute in Solna, Sweden.

resultsAmong the nominees, we find renowned scholars like Pierre Delbet, Themistocles Gluck, Gerhard Küntscher, Adolf Lorenz, Friedrich Pauwels, Leslie Rush, and Marius Smith-Petersen. The focus of the paper is on nominations for Pauwels (work on biomechanics) and Küntscher (the Küntscher nail). Both were nominated by German surgeons.

conclusionsAlthough no orthopaedic surgeon has yet received a Nobel Prize for an orthopaedic achievement, Nobel archive files can help reconstruct important trends in the field during the twentieth century.

Indexed as

History, 20th CenturyHumansNobel PrizeOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsSwedenAdolf LorenzExcellence in orthopaedic surgeryFriedrich PauwelsGerhard KüntscherNobel Prize in physiology or medicineThemistocles Gluck

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.