Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097687›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Predicting meniscal tear stability across knee-joint flexion using finite-element analysis.

Angela E Kedgley, Teng-Hui Saw, Neil A Segal, Ulrich N Hansen, Anthony M J Bull, Spyros D Masouros

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current Rehabilitation Principles Following Meniscus Repairs.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Validation of a Finite Element Simulation for Predicting Individual Knee Joint Kinematics.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela E KedgleyDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines Building, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Teng-Hui SawDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines Building, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Neil A SegalDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Ulrich N HansenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, City and Guilds Building, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Anthony M J BullDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines Building, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Spyros D MasourosDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Royal School of Mines Building, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. s.masouros04@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-5548
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse the stress distribution through longitudinal and radial meniscal tears in three tear locations in weight-bearing conditions and use it to ascertain the impact of tear location and type on the potential for healing of meniscal tears.

methodsSubject-specific finite-element models of a healthy knee under static loading at 0°, 20°, and 30° knee flexion were developed from unloaded magnetic resonance images and weight-bearing, contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. Simulations were then run after introducing tears into the anterior, posterior, and midsections of the menisci.

resultsAbsolute differences between the displacements of anterior and posterior segments modelled in the intact state and those quantified from in vivo weight-bearing images were less than 0.5 mm. There were tear-location-dependent differences between hoop stress distributions along the inner and outer surfaces of longitudinal tears; the longitudinal tear surfaces were compressed together to the greatest degree in the lateral meniscus and were most consistently in compression on the midsections of both menisci. Radial tears resulted in an increase in stress at the tear apex and in a consistent small compression of the tear surfaces throughout the flexion range when in the posterior segment of the lateral meniscus.

conclusionsBoth the type of meniscal tear and its location within the meniscus influenced the stresses on the tear surfaces under weight bearing. Results agree with clinical observations and suggest reasons for the inverse correlation between longitudinal tear length and healing, the inferior healing ability of medial compared with lateral menisci, and the superior healing ability of radial tears in the posterior segment of the lateral meniscus compared with other radial tears. This study has shown that meniscal tear location in addition to type likely plays a crucial role in dictating the success of non-operative treatment of the menisci. This may be used in decision making regarding conservative or surgical management.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisModels, BiologicalAdultArthroscopyHumansKneeKnee InjuriesKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMenisci, TibialPressureRange of Motion, ArticularTibial Meniscus InjuriesTomography, X-Ray ComputedWeight-BearingArthroscopyBiomechanicsFinite element analysisKneeMeniscal tearMeniscusReconstructionRepairSurgery

Identifiers

PMID30097687
PMCPMC6510819
OpenAlexW2885820856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.