Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097600›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Biological significance and prognostic relevance of peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in soft tissue sarcoma.

Jason Yongsheng Chan, Zewen Zhang, Winston Chew, Grace Fangmin Tan, Chloe Liwen Lim, Lingyue Zhou, Wei Lin Goh, Eileen Poon, Nagavalli Somasundaram, Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bibliometric analysis of liposarcomas treatment from 2004 to 2023.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jason Yongsheng ChanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Zewen ZhangDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Winston ChewDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Grace Fangmin TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Chloe Liwen LimDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Lingyue ZhouDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Lin GohDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Eileen PoonDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Nagavalli SomasundaramDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Sathiyamoorthy SelvarajanDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Kesavan SittampalamDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Francis ChinDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Jonathan TehDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Mann Hong TanDivision of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Khee Chee SooDivision of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Melissa TeoDivision of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Mohamad FaridDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Richard QuekDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore. Richard.quek.h.h@singhealth.com.sg.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral blood indices of systemic inflammation such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been shown to be prognostic in various cancers. We aim to investigate the clinical significance of these indices in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Seven hundred and twelve patients with available blood counts at diagnosis and/or metastatic relapse were retrospectively examined. An optimal cutoff for NLR-high (>2.5) in predicting overall survival (OS) was determined using receiver operating curve analyses. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional models. Our results show that NLR was significantly higher in patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis (n = 183) compared to those without (n = 529) (median: 4.36 vs 2.85, p < 0.0001). Progression of localized disease at diagnosis to metastatic relapse within the same patients was associated with an interval increase in NLR (median: 3.21 vs 3.74, p = 0.0003). In multivariate analysis, NLR-high was the only consistent factor independently associated with both worse OS (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.13, p = 0.0112) and relapse-free survival (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.08-1.85, p = 0.0125) in localized disease, as well as OS (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.16-2.85, p = 0.0087) in metastatic/unresectable disease. In conclusion, high NLR is an independent marker of poor prognosis among patients with STS.

Indexed as

Leukocyte CountLymphocytesNeutrophilsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersComorbidityFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30097600
PMCPMC6086886
OpenAlexW2885950960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.