Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018
Clinical Use of a New Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide66 Composite Artificial Lamina in Spinal Decompression Surgery: More Than 4 Years' Follow-Up.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress in Biomedical Materials.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Safety and functional evaluation of a synthetic lamina cover that replaces lost autologous spinal bone after laminectomy, in a sheep and human study.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Polymeric Dural Biomaterials in Spinal Surgery: A Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial lamina after laminectomy: Progress, applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Nomogram for predicting the unfavourable outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term follow-up results showed that epidural scar formation and adhesion after laminectomy always affected the outcomes of repeat operations. The establishment of a barrier between scar tissue and dura was effective in preventing epidural scar formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS A nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 (n-HA/PA66) artificial lamina was designed and fabricated and used to cover the opened spinal canal in patients who received laminectomy. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Scores, X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging results were periodically recorded and evaluated. RESULTS All patients were followed up for 4-7 years, with an average period of 5.2 years. The clinical symptoms improved significantly after surgery, as the JOA scores were significantly improved after the operation and maintained to last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). The vertebral canal became noticeably enlarged, from 16.7±4.7 mm to 32.9±2.2 mm, after surgery and well maintained to 32.1±1.8 mm. The lumbar lordosis was well maintained after surgery. No rupture, absorption, or dislodgement of the n-HA/PA66 lamina was found. MRI showed the spinal canal had the correct morphology, with no stenosis, no obvious scar formation, and no nerve roots or epidural sac compression. CONCLUSIONS The artificial lamina is a reasonable choice for prevention of epidural scar formation after laminectomy, in spite of the results from a small sample of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.