ArticleNeurology2018
Physician-scientists in neurology: Research contributions of a cohort of neurologists.
Article in Neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Future Directions of Training Physician-Scientists: Reimagining and Remeasuring the Workforce.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byShort Takes.2019
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the methods by which neurology physician-scientists are quantified through applying author-level metrics to commonly used definitions when discussing funding efforts aimed at the attrition of the physician-scientist workforce.
methodsNeurology residency alumni from institutions with the highest National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke funding were identified for 2003-2005, and their funding records, publishing history, and impact factor (
resultsFrom 15 programs, and from a total of 252 neurologists, 186 were identified as having demonstrated an interest in research. The mean
conclusionsWhile eventual R01 grant and early career funding pathways were confirmed as important components of higher
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.