Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097472›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018

Whole Genome Sequencing,

Samina Naseeb, Haya Alsammar, Tim Burgis, Ian Donaldson, Norman Knyazev, Christopher Knight, Daniela Delneri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The metabolic domestication syndrome of budding yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. BeyondFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Restoring fertility in yeast hybrids: Breeding and quantitative genetics of beneficial traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Unique Brewing-Relevant Properties of a Strain ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samina NaseebManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK, M1 7DN samina.naseeb@manchester.ac.uk d.delneri@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-5813
Haya AlsammarManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK, M1 7DN.
Tim BurgisManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK, M1 7DN.
Ian DonaldsonManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK, M1 7DN.
Norman KnyazevManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK, M1 7DN.
Christopher KnightManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK, M1 7DN.ORCID 0000-0001-9815-4267
Daniela DelneriManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK, M1 7DN samina.naseeb@manchester.ac.uk d.delneri@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8070-411X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L021471/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017702/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalPhenotypeSequence Analysis, DNAChromosomes, FungalSaccharomycesevolutionfitnessPacBioSaccharomycestranslocation

Identifiers

PMID30097472
PMCPMC6118302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.