Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097442›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2018

Multi-omic Analyses of Extensively Decayed Pinus contorta Reveal Expression of a Diverse Array of Lignocellulose-Degrading Enzymes.

Chiaki Hori, Jill Gaskell, Dan Cullen, Grzegorz Sabat, Philip E Stewart, Kathleen Lail, Yi Peng, Kerrie Barry, Igor V Grigoriev, Annegret Kohler and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic and Secretomic Analyses of the Newly Isolated FungusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Foliar EndophyteMicrobiology resource announcements · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Chiaki HoriSchool of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Jill GaskellUSDA, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Dan CullenUSDA, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin, USA dcullen@wisc.edu.
Grzegorz SabatUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Philip E StewartRocky Mountain Laboratories, NIAID, NIH, Hamilton, Montana, USA.
Kathleen LailUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Yi PengUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Kerrie BarryUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Igor V GrigorievUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
Annegret KohlerInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1136, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Micro-organismes, Champenoux, France.
Laure FaucheryInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1136, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Micro-organismes, Champenoux, France.
Francis MartinInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1136, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Micro-organismes, Champenoux, France.
Carolyn A ZeinerDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer M BhatnagarDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes · FRJoint Genome Institute · USBoston University · USForest Products Laboratory · USHokkaido University · JPRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi play a key role cycling nutrients in forest ecosystems, but the mechanisms remain uncertain. To clarify the enzymatic processes involved in wood decomposition, the metatranscriptomics and metaproteomics of extensively decayed lodgepole pine were examined by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), respectively. Following

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaCellulasesGene Expression ProfilingGenome, FungalGlycoside HydrolasesHydrolysisLigninOxidation-ReductionPinusProteomicsWoodCellulasesGlycoside HydrolaseshemicellulaseLigninlignocellulosebrown rotmetaproteomemetatranscriptomePinuswhite rot

Identifiers

PMID30097442
PMCPMC6182905
OpenAlexW2886492291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.