Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097419›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2018

Differences in the Effect of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Improving Nonclinical Depressive Symptoms Among Workers by Time Preference: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kotaro Imamura, Toshi A Furukawa, Yutaka Matsuyama, Akihito Shimazu, Kazuto Kuribayashi, Kiyoto Kasai, Norito Kawakami

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kotaro ImamuraDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2584-0666
Toshi A FurukawaDepartments of Health Promotion and Human Behavior and of Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-3776
Yutaka MatsuyamaDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-6831
Akihito ShimazuCenter for Human and Social Sciences, Kitasato University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7172-0043
Kazuto KuribayashiDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7513-2807
Kiyoto KasaiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4443-4535
Norito KawakamiDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-2720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown a significant intervention effect of internet-based computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) on improving nonclinical depressive symptoms among healthy workers and community residents in a primary prevention setting. Time preference is one's relative valuation for having a reward (eg, money) at present than at a later date. Time preference may affect the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy.

objectiveThis RCT aimed to test the difference of intervention effect of an iCBT program on improving nonclinical depressive symptoms between two subgroups classified post-hoc on the basis of time preference among workers in Japan.

methodsAll workers in one corporate group (approximate n=20,000) were recruited. Participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated to either intervention or control groups. Participants in the intervention group completed 6 weekly lessons and homework assignments within the iCBT program. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale (K6) measures were obtained at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Two subgroups were defined by the median of time preference score at baseline.

resultsOnly few (835/20,000, 4.2%) workers completed the baseline survey. Of the 835 participants, 706 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Participants who selected irrational time preference options were excluded (21 and 18 participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively). A three-way interaction (group [intervention/control] × time [baseline/follow-up] × time preference [higher/lower]) effect of iCBT was significant for BDI-II (t

conclusionsThe effects of the iCBT were greater for the group with higher time preference at the shorter follow-up, but it was leveled off later. Workers with higher time preference may change their cognition or behavior more quickly, but these changes may not persist.

trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000014146; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi? recptno=R000016466 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70o2rNk2V).

Indexed as

AdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFemaleHumansInternetMaleTime FactorsWorkloadinternet-based computerized cognitive behavioral therapynonclinical depressive symptomstime preferenceworkers

Identifiers

PMID30097419
PMCPMC6109227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.