Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30097381›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2018

Patterns of family communication and preferred resources for sharing information among families with a Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

Jenna Petersen, Cathryn Koptiuch, Yelena P Wu, Ryan Mooney, Ashley Elrick, Kathryn Szczotka, Megan Keener, Lisa Pappas, Priyanka Kanth, Andrew Soisson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jenna PetersenHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: jenna.petersen@utah.edu.
Cathryn KoptiuchHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: cathryn.koptiuch@hci.utah.edu.
Yelena P WuHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: yelena.wu@utah.edu.
Ryan MooneyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: u0576405@utah.edu.
Ashley ElrickHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: ashley.elrick@hci.utah.edu.
Kathryn SzczotkaDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: kathryn.szczotka@hsc.utah.edu.
Megan KeenerHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: megan.keener@hci.utah.edu.
Lisa PappasHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: lisa.pappas@hci.utah.edu.
Priyanka KanthHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: priyanka.kanth@hsc.utah.edu.
Andrew SoissonHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: andrew.soisson@hsc.utah.edu.
Wendy KohlmannHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: wendy.kohlmann@hci.utah.edu.
Kimberly A KaphingstHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: kim.kaphingst@hci.utah.edu.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KATHARINE S ULLMAN · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Translational Approaches to Melanoma Prevention in Children at High Genetic RiskK07CA196985 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WU, YELENA PING · 2015 to 2019
$682k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS K07 CA196985NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore patterns of communication among families with a Lynch syndrome diagnosis and understand what resources could facilitate family communication.

methods127 probands (i.e., first person in family with identified mutation) and family members participated in semi-structured interviews about: how they learned about the Lynch syndrome diagnosis, with whom they shared genetic test results, confidence in sharing results with other family members, and helpfulness of educational resources.

resultsBoth probands and family members were most likely to share genetic test results with parents and siblings, and least likely to share results with aunts, uncles, and cousins. Most participants felt very confident sharing their test results with family members, but reported that certain topics such as cancer risk were challenging to convey. Probands reported the most helpful resources to be access to a specialty clinic or website, while family members described general printed materials as most helpful.

conclusionsFamilies affected by Lynch syndrome may experience barriers to communication with more distant relatives, and may benefit from receiving specific resources (e.g., websites about Lynch syndrome, print materials) to facilitate family communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Providers could emphasize the need to share information with more distant family members and provide appropriate supportive resources.

Indexed as

CommunicationInformation DisseminationAdultAgedColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisCommunication BarriersFamilyFemaleGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicFamily communicationLynch syndromePatient education

Identifiers

PMID30097381
PMCPMC6179927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.