ReviewCancers2018
Organotypic 3D Models of the Ovarian Cancer Tumor Microenvironment.
Review in Cancers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel ex vivo platform for functional evaluation of treatment responses in metastatic ovarian cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility and Chemosensitivity to KRAS Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional in vitro models in head and neck cancer: current trends and applications.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Review
- Effect of Polyplex Size on Penetration into Tumor Spheroids.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- A comparative analysis of 2D and 3D experimental data for the identification of the parameters of computational models.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- In Vitro Models of Ovarian Cancer: Bridging the Gap between Pathophysiology and Mechanistic Models.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- The metastatic capacity of high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells changes along disease progression: inhibition by mifepristone.Cancer cell international · 2022Article
- Review
- Metastatic Voyage of Ovarian Cancer Cells in Ascites with the Assistance of Various Cellular Components.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- Three-Dimensional Modelling of Ovarian Cancer: From Cell Lines to Organoids for Discovery and Personalized Medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- NovelFrontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Three-Dimensional 3D Culture Models in Gynecological and Breast Cancer Research.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- Models for measuring metabolic chemical changes in the metastasis of high grade serous ovarian cancer: fallopian tube, ovary, and omentum.Molecular omics · 2021Review
- Self-Assembling Polypeptide Hydrogels as a Platform to Recapitulate the Tumor Microenvironment.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer progression involves multifaceted and variable tumor microenvironments (TMEs), from the in situ carcinoma in the fallopian tube or ovary to dissemination into the peritoneal cavity as single cells or spheroids and attachment to the mesothelial-lined surfaces of the omentum, bowel, and abdominal wall. The TME comprises the tumor vasculature and lymphatics (including endothelial cells and pericytes), in addition to mesothelial cells, fibroblasts, immune cells, adipocytes and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. When generating 3D models of the ovarian cancer TME, researchers must incorporate the most relevant stromal components depending on the TME in question (e.g., early or late disease). Such complexity cannot be captured by monolayer 2D culture systems. Moreover, immortalized stromal cell lines, such as mesothelial or fibroblast cell lines, do not always behave the same as primary cells whose response in functional assays may vary from donor to donor; 3D models with primary stromal cells may have more physiological relevance than those using stromal cell lines. In the current review, we discuss the latest developments in organotypic 3D models of the ovarian cancer early metastatic microenvironment. Organotypic culture models comprise two or more interacting cell types from a particular tissue. We focus on organotypic 3D models that include at least one type of primary stromal cell type in an ECM background, such as collagen or fibronectin, plus ovarian cancer cells. We provide an overview of the two most comprehensive current models-a 3D model of the omental mesothelium and a microfluidic model. We describe the cellular and non-cellular components of the models, the incorporation of mechanical forces, and how the models have been adapted and utilized in functional assays. Finally, we review a number of 3D models that do not incorporate primary stromal cells and summarize how integration of current models may be the next essential step in tackling the complexity of the different ovarian cancer TMEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.