Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30096949›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Modeling Endometrial Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.

Tom Van Nyen, Cristian P Moiola, Eva Colas, Daniela Annibali, Frédéric Amant

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Bridging the Gap from Bench to Bedside: A Call for In Vivo Preclinical Models to Advance Endometrial Cancer and Cervical Cancer Immuno-oncology Research.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tom Van NyenDepartment of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. tom.vannyen@kuleuven.be.
Cristian P MoiolaPathological Oncology Group, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA), University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain. cristian.pablo@vhir.org.
Eva ColasBiomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. eva.colas@vhir.org.
Daniela AnnibaliDepartment of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. daniela.annibali@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-8413-7669
Frédéric AmantDepartment of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. frederic.amant@uzleuven.be.
KU Leuven · BEHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ESThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common type of cancer of the female reproductive tract. Although prognosis is generally good for patients with low-grade and early-stage diseases, the outcomes for high-grade and metastatic/recurrent cases remain poor, since traditional chemotherapy regimens based on platinum and taxanes have limited effects. No targeted agents have been approved so far, although several new drugs have been tested without striking results in clinical trials. Over the last decades, many efforts have been made towards the establishment and development of preclinical models, aiming at recapitulating the structural and molecular determinants of the disease. Here, we present an overview of the most commonly used in vitro and in vivo models and discuss their peculiar features, describing their main applications and the value in the advancement of both fundamental and translational endometrial cancer research.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisTaxoidsTaxoidsendometrial cancerpreclinical modelstranslational research

Identifiers

PMID30096949
PMCPMC6121384
OpenAlexW2886324201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.