Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30096321›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2018

Receipt of adjuvant endometrial cancer treatment according to race: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study.

Ashley S Felix, David E Cohn, Theodore M Brasky, Richard Zaino, Kay Park, David G Mutch, William T Creasman, Premal H Thaker, Joan L Walker, Richard G Moore and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2025.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley S FelixDivision of Epidemiology, Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: Felix.20@osu.edu.
David E CohnDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Theodore M BraskyDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Richard ZainoDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Hershey Medical Center/Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA.
Kay ParkSurgical Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
David G MutchWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
William T CreasmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Premal H ThakerWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Joan L WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK.
Richard G MooreProgram in Women's Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI.
Shashikant B LeleGynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
Saketh R GuntupalliGynecologic Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.
Levi S DownsGynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Christa I NagelGynecologic Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
John F BoggessGynecologic Oncology Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Michael L PearlGynecologic Oncology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.
Olga B IoffeAnatomical Pathology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Marcus E RandallUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Louise A BrintonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
The Ohio State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USBrown University · USCase Western Reserve University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USPennsylvania State University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USState University of New York · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network - Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233324 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ANTHONY D ELIAS · 2019 to 2026
$5.2M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site Grant from the Roswell Cancer Inst.U10CA180866 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ERNSTOFF, MARC S, LELE, SHASHIKANT · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180866NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlack women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of their disease compared with white women with endometrial cancer. These survival disparities persist even when disproportionately worse tumor characteristics among black women are accounted. Receipt of less complete adjuvant treatment among black patients with endometrial cancer could contribute to this disparity.

objectiveWe assessed the hypothesis that black women with endometrial cancer are less likely than their white counterparts to receive adjuvant treatment within subgroups defined by tumor characteristics in the NRG Oncology/Gynecology Oncology Group 210 Study. STUDY

designOur analysis included 615 black and 4283 white women with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy. Women completed a questionnaire that assessed race and endometrial cancer risk factors. Tumor characteristics were available from pathology reports and central review. We categorized women as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk based on the European Society for Medical Oncology definition. Adjuvant treatment was documented during postoperative visits and was categorized as no adjuvant treatment (54.3%), radiotherapy only (16.5%), chemotherapy only (15.2%), and radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (14.0%). We used polytomous logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for multivariable-adjusted associations between race and adjuvant treatment in the overall study population and stratified by tumor subtype, stage, or European Society for Medical Oncology risk category.

resultsOverall, black women were more likely to have received chemotherapy only (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.86) or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.62) compared with white women in multivariable-adjusted models. No racial difference in the receipt of radiotherapy only was observed. In tumor subtype-stratified models, black women had higher odds of receiving radiotherapy plus chemotherapy than white women when diagnosed with low-grade endometrioid (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.93) or serous tumors (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.08). Race was not associated with adjuvant treatment among women who had been diagnosed with other tumor subtypes. In stage-stratified models, we observed no racial differences in the receipt of adjuvant treatment. In models that were stratified by European Society for Medical Oncology risk group, black women with high-risk cancer were more likely to receive radiotherapy plus chemotherapy compared with white women (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.94).

conclusionContrary to our hypothesis, we observed higher odds of specific adjuvant treatment regimens among black women as compared with white women within specific subgroups of endometrial cancer characteristics.

Indexed as

AgedBlack or African AmericanChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioRadiotherapy, AdjuvantWhite Peopleadjuvant treatmentendometrial cancerracial differencestumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID30096321
PMCPMC6239903
OpenAlexW2885112269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.