ArticlePloS one2018
High school science fair: Student opinions regarding whether participation should be required or optional and why.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- High school science fair: Characterizing student communication and presentation practices and their association with SEF outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- High school science fair: Characterizing student communication and presentation practices and their association with SEF outcomes.PloS one · 2026Article
- High school science fair: What students say-mastery, performance, and self-determination theory.PloS one · 2025Article
- High school science fair: School location trends in student participation and experience.PloS one · 2023Article
- No Science Fair? No Problem. Engaging Students in Science Communication through Peer Review and Publication in a Remote World.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2022Article
- Article
- High school science fair: Experiences of two groups of undergraduate bioscience students.PloS one · 2021Article
- Getting Everyone to the Fair: Supporting Teachers in Broadening Participation in Science and Engineering Fairs.Journal of science education and technology · 2021Article
- High school science fair: Positive and negative outcomes.PloS one · 2020Article
- Engaging the Community through Science Nights: An Elementary School Case Study.Journal of STEM outreach · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of our research is to identify strengths and weaknesses of high school level science fair and improvements that might enhance learning outcomes based on empirical assessment of student experiences. We use the web-based data collection program REDCap to implement anonymous and voluntary surveys about science fair experiences with two independent groups-high school students who recently competed in the Dallas Regional Science and Engineering Fair and post high school students (undergraduates, 1st year medical students, and 1st year biomedical graduate students) on STEM education tracks doing research at UT Southwestern Medical Center. Herein, we report quantitative and qualitative data showing student opinions about the value of science fair. Few students in any group thought that competitive science fair (C-SF) should be required. The most common reasons given for not requiring C-SF were no enjoyment and no interest in competing. On the other hand, student attitudes towards requiring non-competitive science fair (NC-SF) were nuanced and ranged as high as 91%, increasing with student maturation, science fair experience, and STEM track. The most common reasons given for requiring NC-SF were learning scientific thinking skills and research skills. Students opposed to requiring NC-SF most frequently mentioned no enjoyment and no interest in science. Several student comments critical of the fairness of science fair led us to determine possible differences in science fair experiences depending on whether or not students received help from scientists. Those who received help from scientists had an easier time getting their research idea, more access to articles in books and magazines, and less difficulty getting resources. We discuss the idea that two different types of science fairs-competitive science fair with a performance goal orientation and non-competitive science fair with a mastery goal orientation-might be required to promote the broad goal of educating all students about science and engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.