Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30095776›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2018

Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sheila K Mody, John Paul Farala, Berenice Jimenez, Moena Nishikawa, Lynn L Ngo

9 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 9 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02219308 nacompletednot on this map

Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Paracervical Block

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2014 to 2017Enrolled67ConditionsPain Due to Intrauterine Contraceptive DeviceArmsParacervical Block (PCB), No Paracervical Block (Sham PCB)
NCT05875571 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Intravenous Ketorolac Administration to Attenuate Post-procedural Pain Associated With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArkansas Children's Hospital Research InstituteRan2024 to 2025Enrolled18ConditionsIUD, Healthy Female, Contraception, IUD Insertion ComplicationArmsKetorolac, Placebo
NCT06960317 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Expanding the Use of Paracervical Block for IUD Placements and Adding a Compassionate Care Assessment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2025 to 2028Enrolled204ConditionsContraception, Pain, Acute, Anesthesia, LocalArmsBuffered Lidocaine, Sham Comparator, Unbuffered lidocaine, Xylocaine jelly 2%, Surgilube
NCT06974019 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Empathy Through Pain Control: Buffered Compared to Unbuffered 1% Lidocaine During IUD Placement

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2025 to 2028Enrolled68ConditionsContraception, Pain, Acute, Anesthesia, LocalArmsBuffered Lidocaine, Lidocaine 1% Injectable Solution
NCT06974032 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Expanding the Use of Paracervical Block for IUD Placements and Adding a Compassionate Care Assessment- Aim 3

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2025 to 2028Enrolled68ConditionsContraception, Pain, Acute, Anesthesia, LocalArmsXylocaine jelly 2%, Surgilube
NCT07008222 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pain Related to Local Anesthetic Administration for Nexplanon Placement: A Randomized Control Trial of Buffered Lidocaine

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled68ConditionsPain Related to Local Anesthetic Administration for Nexplanon PlacementArmswe will prepare 3cc of buffered lidocaine consisting of 2.7cc of 1% lidocaine and 0.3cc of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate, Unbuffered lidocaine
NCT07044622 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Intrauterine Device (IUD) Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsPainArmsTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
NCT07048769 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Paracervical Block for Saline Infusion Sonogram in Fertility Evaluation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled246ConditionsPain During Saline Infusion SonogramArmsLidocaine, Sham paracervical block
NCT07546370 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The PLAN IUD Trial: The Effectiveness of Topical Prilocaine-Lidocaine Cream Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen Compared to Lidocaine Injection Plus Acetaminophen and Naproxen to Manage Pain During IntraUterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonakshi SawhneyRan2026 to 2027Enrolled66ConditionsPain During Intrauterine Device InsertionArmsPrilocaine, Lidocaine, Lidocaine HCl 1%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effective analgesic options for intrauterine device placement pain.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheila K ModyDivision of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, and Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, California.
John Paul Farala
Berenice Jimenez
Moena Nishikawa
Lynn L Ngo
Los Angeles Medical Center · US

Funding

UC San Diego Womens Reproductive Health Research ProgramK12HD001259 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CYNTHIA GYAMFI-BANNERMAN · 1999 to 2026
$9.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether a 20-mL buffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block decreases pain during intrauterine device (IUD) placement.

methodsIn a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial, women were assigned to receive either a 20-mL buffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block or no block before IUD placement. The primary outcome was pain with IUD placement measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Our sample size had 80% power (α=0.05) to detect a 20-mm difference in visual analog scale scores with a SD of 28 mm. Secondary outcomes included pain with speculum placement, paracervical block administration, tenaculum placement, 5 minutes postprocedure, and overall pain perception.

resultsFrom October 7, 2014, through October 26, 2017, 64 women were enrolled and analyzed (33 in the paracervical block arm, 31 in the no-block arm). There were no differences in baseline demographics between the groups. Women who received the paracervical block reported less pain with IUD placement compared with women who received no block (median visual analog scale score of 33 mm vs 54 mm, P=.002). Pain was significantly less in the intervention group for uterine sounding (30 mm vs 47 mm, P=.005), 5 minutes after placement (12 mm vs 27 mm, P=.005), and overall pain perception (30 mm vs 51 mm, P=.015). Participants who received the paracervical block experienced more pain with block administration compared with placebo (30 mm vs 8 mm, P=.003). There was no perceived pain difference for speculum insertion (10 mm vs 6 mm, P=.447) or tenaculum placement (15 mm vs 10 mm, P=.268).

conclusionA 20-mL buffered 1% lidocaine paracervical block decreases pain with IUD placement (primary outcome), uterine sounding (secondary outcome), and 5 minutes after placement (secondary outcome). Although paracervical block administration can be painful, perception of pain for overall IUD placement procedure is lower compared with no block. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02219308.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalIntrauterine DevicesAdultFemaleHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30095776
PMCPMC6438819
OpenAlexW2887085206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 3 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.