Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30095643›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for treatment of tibial shaft fractures in adults.

Xiao Chen, Hai-Tao Xu, Hong-Jun Zhang, Jing Chen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach intramedullary nailing for tibal shaft fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing: Future or Fad?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical Faceoff: Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing for Tibia Fractures.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiao ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Sichuan Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Department of Neonatology, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Sichuan, China.
Hai-Tao Xu
Hong-Jun Zhang
Jing Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies have compared suprapatellar (SP) nailing to infrapatellar (IP) nailing for treatment of tibial shaft fractures; however, the best strategy remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess whether SP or IP nailing is more effective for tibial shaft fractures in adults.

methodsLiterature searches of PubMed, Embase, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature, Wanfang, Weipu Journal, and CNKI databases were performed up to July 2017. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SP versus IP intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures were included. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards.

resultsTwelve RCTs were selected for analysis. SP intramedullary nailing reduced knee joint pain, visual analog score, fluoroscopy time, and sagittal angle, resulting in better Harris hip score, Lysholm knee score, short-form 36 questionnaire, range of motion, and rates of "excellent" and "good" outcome. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, union time, and coronal angle between groups.

conclusionThe present meta-analysis indicates that SP intramedullary nailing has obvious advantages over IP intramedullary nailing for treatment of tibial shaft fractures in adults. However, owing to the low-quality evidence currently available, additional high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Bone NailsAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleFluoroscopyFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularTibial Fractures

Identifiers

PMID30095643
PMCPMC6133600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.