Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30095615›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

A novel CRX frameshift mutation causing cone-rod dystrophy in a Chinese family: A case report.

Lihua Wang, Anhui Qi, Hong Pan, Beihong Liu, Jingjing Feng, Wei Chen, Binbin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lihua WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Haidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College Center for Genetics, National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing, China.
Anhui Qi
Hong Pan
Beihong Liu
Jingjing Feng
Wei Chen
Binbin Wang
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNHainan Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNBeijing Haidian Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCone-rod dystrophy (CORD) is an inherited, progressive retinal disorder with genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Here, we aimed to identify the pathogenic mutation in affected individuals in a Chinese family with autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy (adCORD).

methodsGenomic DNA and clinical examination results were collected from a Chinese family presenting with adCORD. The candidate disease-causing mutations were screened with whole-exome sequencing (WES) and bioinformatics analyses. Sanger sequencing was used for validation and cosegregation analysis.

resultsA novel frameshift mutation (NM_000554.4; c.538dupG:p.Val180fs) in exon 4 of the CRX gene was identified in all affected individuals in the Chinese family with adCORD. Cosegregation analysis confirmed that this mutation was cosegregated with the disease. This variant, which results in premature termination of the protein, was absent from all public variant databases or internal exome databases.

conclusionsWe used whole-exome sequencing to identify a novel CRX mutation causing adCORD in a Chinese family. This study broadens the known pathogenic mutation spectrum of the CRX gene and shows the potential of WES in identifying the pathogenic mutations of CORD disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAsian PeopleChinaCone-Rod DystrophiesExome SequencingFemaleFrameshift MutationHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMalePedigreeTrans-ActivatorsYoung Adultcone rod homeobox proteinHomeodomain ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID30095615
PMCPMC6133598
OpenAlexW2885309712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.