Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30095428›Full record

ArticleIET nanobiotechnology2018

Cytotoxicity of biologically synthesised bismuth nanoparticles against HT-29 cell line.

Mojtaba Shakibaie, Hamid Forootanfar, Atefeh Ameri, Mahboubeh Adeli-Sardou, Mandana Jafari, Hamid Reza Rahimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Metal Nanoparticles in Infection and Immunity.Immunological investigations · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cytotoxicity of bismuth(III) dithiocarbamate derivatives by promoting a mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathway and suppressing MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cell invasion.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2024
    Article
  4. Bioactive Bismuth Compounds: Is Their Toxicity a Barrier to Therapeutic Use?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mojtaba ShakibaiePharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Hamid ForootanfarHerbal and Traditional Medicines Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Atefeh AmeriPharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mahboubeh Adeli-SardouHerbal and Traditional Medicines Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mandana JafariPharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Hamid Reza RahimiSudent Research Committee, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. hamidrrt@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was purposed to examine the cytotoxicity and functions of biologically synthesised bismuth nanoparticles (Bi NPs) produced by

Indexed as

AntioxidantsBismuthCell SurvivalHT29 CellsHumansMetal NanoparticlesOxidative StressAntioxidantsBismuth

Identifiers

PMID30095428
PMCPMC8676642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.