Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30095376›Full record

ArticlePhysiological genomics2018

Disparate effects of antibiotics on hypertension.

S Galla, S Chakraborty, X Cheng, J Yeo, B Mell, H Zhang, A V Mathew, M Vijay-Kumar, B Joe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Food as Medicine for Hypertension: Microbiota as Mediators.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Gut microbiota and arterial hypertension: a narrative review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Oxidative Stress in Kidney Injury and Hypertension.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  10. Gut microbiota: a potential new regulator of hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Regulatory effect of gut microbes on blood pressure.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S GallaProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.
S ChakrabortyProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.
X ChengProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-0838-5094
J YeoProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.
B MellProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.
H ZhangProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.
A V MathewDepartment of Internal Medicine-Nephrology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
M Vijay-KumarProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.
B JoeProgram in Physiological Genomics, Microbiome Consortium, Center for Hypertension and Personalized Medicine, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo, Ohio.
University of Toledo · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

University of Michigan O'Brien Kidney Translational Core CenterP30DK081943 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PENNATHUR, SUBRAMANIAM · 2008 to 2022
$12.9M
Interplay between Dietary Fiber and Gut Microbiota in Hepatocellular CarcinomaR01CA219144 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI VIJAY-KUMAR, MATAM · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
Myeloperoxidase, Chronic Kidney Disease and AtherosclerosisK08HL130944 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MATHEW, ANNA VACHAPARAMPIL · 2016 to 2021
$893k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA219144NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL130944NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK081943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota are associated with a variety of complex polygenic diseases. The usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics by patients affected by such diseases is an important environmental factor to consider, because antibiotics, which are widely prescribed to curb pathological bacterial infections, also indiscriminately eliminate gut commensal microbiota. However, the extent to which antibiotics reshape gut microbiota and per se contribute to these complex diseases is understudied. Because genetics play an important role in predisposing individuals to these modern diseases, we hypothesize that the extent to which antibiotics influence complex diseases depends on the host genome and metagenome. The current study tests this hypothesis in the context of hypertension, which is a serious risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. A 3 × 2 factorial design was used to test the blood pressure (BP) and microbiotal effects of three different antibiotics, neomycin, minocycline, and vancomycin, on two well-known, preclinical, genetic models of hypertension, the Dahl salt-sensitive (S) rat and the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), both of which develop hypertension, but for different genetic reasons. Regardless of the class, oral administration of antibiotics increased systolic blood pressure of the S rat, while minocycline and vancomycin, but not neomycin, lowered systolic blood pressure in the SHR. These disparate BP effects were accompanied by significant alterations in gut microbiota. Our study highlights the need to consider an individualized approach for the usage of antibiotics among hypertensives, as their BP could be affected differentially based on their individual genetic and microbiotal communities.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood PressureGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHypertensionMinocyclineNeomycinRats, Inbred DahlRats, Inbred SHRSodium Chloride, DietarySpecies SpecificityVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMinocyclineNeomycinSodium Chloride, DietaryVancomycinblood pressuremicrobiotaminocyclineneomycinvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID30095376
PMCPMC6230872
OpenAlexW2886914658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.