Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30095360›Full record

Trial reportPerfusion2019

Cardioplegia practice in paediatric cardiac surgery: a UK & Ireland survey.

Nigel E Drury, Angela Horsburgh, Rehana Bi, Robert G Willetts, Timothy J Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Perfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Warm versus cold blood cardioplegia in paediatric congenital heart surgery: a randomized trial.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardioplegia in Open Heart Surgery: Age Matters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nigel E Drury1 Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-6683
Angela Horsburgh1 Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Rehana Bi1 Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Robert G Willetts1 Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Timothy J Jones1 Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Birmingham Children's Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/49/31612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany techniques are available for cardioplegic arrest in children, but there is a lack of late phase clinical trials to guide practice. We surveyed paediatric cardiac surgeons and perfusionists to establish current practice and willingness to change within a clinical trial.

methodsAn online survey was sent to all consultant paediatric cardiac surgeons and chief perfusionists in paediatric centres in the UK and Ireland. Information was sought on cardioplegia type, composition, temperature, topical cooling, dosing for induction and maintenance, interval between doses, whether practice changed with patient age or complexity and whether respondents would be willing and able to use different cardioplegia solutions within a randomised trial.

resultsResponses were obtained from 32 (78.0%) surgeons and 12 (100%) perfusionists. Twenty-seven (84.4%) surgeons use blood cardioplegia in infants, with St. Thomas' Harefield preparation the most popular (19, 59.4%), used routinely in eight (66.7%) centres. Twenty-two (68.8%) administer at 4-6°C, 18 (56.3%) use topical cooling, 18 (56.3%) give 30 ml/kg induction and 15 ml/kg maintenance, with 23 (71.9%) re-dosing every 20-25 minutes. Thirty (93.8%) surgeons were open to randomising patients in a trial, with del Nido (29, 90.6%) the most popular.

conclusionsThis survey demonstrates heterogeneity in cardioplegia practice. Whilst most surgeons use blood cardioplegia, there is variation in type, temperature, topical cooling, dosing and intervals. Combined with a lack of evidence from late phase trials, our findings support the presence of clinical equipoise. Surgeons are willing to change practice, suggesting that a pragmatic, multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial of cardioplegia in children is feasible.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresChildFemaleHeart Arrest, InducedHumansIrelandMaleOnline SystemsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomcardioplegiamyocardial protectionpaediatric cardiac surgery

Identifiers

PMID30095360
PMCPMC6378396
OpenAlexW2885406111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.