ArticleBritish dental journal2018
Evaluation of the first year of Dental Health Partnerships: a web-based distance learning partnership between UK dental educators and students from low-resource countries.
Article in British dental journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To introduce and discuss the results of a newly-founded online, distance learning organisation, Dental Health Partnerships. The motivation behind the project is to bridge the gap between dental educators in the UK and dental students in low-resource communities. The results of the first partnership with Amoud Dental University, Somaliland, are presented. Method: Sixteen tutorials were conducted between February 2016 and June 2016 for the final year dental students via an online virtual classroom (WizIQ). Sixteen students participated in the weekly tutorials, each of which lasted for approximately 90 minutes. The students were sent online questionnaires at two stages during the study to qualitatively evaluate their experience. Results: Nine of the sixteen students responded to both questionnaires. One-hundred percent of the participants were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with the programme at the end of the year. The attendance and participation rates for the weekly sessions were positive. The students had theoretical knowledge of the topics, however, the application of theoretical concepts to clinical scenarios was a challenge. Conclusion: The results of the first year of the partnership indicates the relevance of case-based tutorials to dental practice in Somaliland, equipping students with the clinical-based knowledge to be effective in the field after graduation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30095133What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.