ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018
Burden of Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Nursing Home Residents.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of nursing homes with high rates of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Clonal Diversity, Antibiotic Resistance, and Virulence Factor Prevalence of Community AssociatedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Construction of A New Dose-Response Model forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Predictors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci co-colonization among nursing facility patients.American journal of infection control · 2019Article
- Plantaricins markedly enhance the effects of traditional antibiotics against Staphylococcus epidermidis.Future microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the epidemiology and incidence of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in nursing home (NH) residents, which has previously not been well characterized.
designRetrospective analysis of public health surveillance data.
settingHealthcare facilities in 33 U.S. counties.
participantsResidents of the surveillance area. MEASUREMENTS: Counts of NH-onset and hospital-onset (HO) invasive MRSA infections (cultured from sterile body sites) identified from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging Infections Program (EIP) population-based surveillance from 2009 to 2013 were compared. Demographic characteristics and risk factors of NH-onset cases were analyzed. Using NH resident-day denominators from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Skilled Nursing Facility Cost Reports, incidence of NH-onset invasive MRSA infections from facilities in the EIP area was determined.
resultsA total of 4,607 NH-onset and 4,344 HO invasive MRSA cases were reported. Of NH-onset cases, median age was 74, most infections were bloodstream infections, and known risk factors for infection were common: 1,455 (32%) had previous MRSA infection or colonization, 1,014 (22%) had decubitus ulcers, 1,098 (24%) had recent central venous catheters, and 1,103 (24%) were undergoing chronic dialysis; 2,499 (54%) had been discharged from a hospital in the previous 100 days. The in-hospital case-fatality rate was 19%. The 2013 pooled mean incidence of NH-onset invasive MRSA infections in the surveillance area was 2.4 per 100,000 patient-days.
conclusionMore NH-onset than HO cases occurred, primarily in individuals with known MRSA risk factors. These data reinforce the importance of infection prevention practices during wound and device care in NH residents, especially those with a history of MRSA infection or colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.