Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094775›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2018

Environmental Drivers of Ranavirus in Free-Living Amphibians in Constructed Ponds.

Tess E Youker-Smith, Philipp H Boersch-Supan, Christopher M Whipps, Sadie J Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tess E Youker-SmithDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-1647
Philipp H Boersch-SupanQuantitative Disease Ecology and Conservation (QDEC) Lab, Department of Geography, University of Florida, 3128 Turlington Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32601, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6723-6833
Christopher M WhippsDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6139-0426
Sadie J RyanQuantitative Disease Ecology and Conservation (QDEC) Lab, Department of Geography, University of Florida, 3128 Turlington Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32601, USA. sjryan@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-6321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibian ranaviruses occur globally, but we are only beginning to understand mechanisms for emergence. Ranaviruses are aquatic pathogens which can cause > 90% mortality in larvae of many aquatic-breeding amphibians, making them important focal host taxa. Host susceptibilities and virulence of ranaviruses have been studied extensively in controlled laboratory settings, but research is needed to identify drivers of infection in natural environments. Constructed ponds, essential components of wetland restoration, have been associated with higher ranavirus prevalence than natural ponds, posing a conundrum for conservation efforts, and emphasizing the need to understand potential drivers. In this study, we analyzed 4 years of Frog virus 3 prevalence and associated environmental parameters in populations of wood frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus) and green frogs (Lithobates clamitans) in a constructed pond system. High prevalence was best predicted by low temperature, high host density, low zooplankton concentrations, and Gosner stages approaching metamorphosis. This study identified important variables to measure in assessments of ranaviral infection risk in newly constructed ponds, including effects of zooplankton, which have not been previously quantified in natural settings. Examining factors mediating diseases in natural environments, particularly in managed conservation settings, is important to both validate laboratory findings in situ, and to inform future conservation planning, particularly in the context of adaptive management.

Indexed as

WetlandsAmphibiansAnimalsDisease SusceptibilityDNA Virus InfectionsLarvaNew YorkPondsRana clamitansRanavirusConstructed wetlandsFrog virus 3Lithobates clamitansLithobates sylvaticusRanavirusVernal pools

Identifiers

PMID30094775
PMCPMC6245063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.