Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094740›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2018

An Overview of Conceptualizations of Eating Disorder Recovery, Recent Findings, and Future Directions.

Anna M Bardone-Cone, Rowan A Hunt, Hunna J Watson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Defining Recovery and Relapse in Bulimia Nervosa: A Systematic Review of the Literature.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Remission in adolescents with bulimia nervosa: Empirical evaluation of current conceptual models.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2020
    Trial
  7. Examining Facets of Body Image Disturbance Across Anorexia Nervosa Illness and Recovery Stages.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Clinician Practices in Determining Expected Body Weights Across Eating Disorders: A Mixed Methods Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa: A Concept Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. When Is the Right Time to End Family Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa (FT-AN)?: A Qualitative Study of Young People's Experiences.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna M Bardone-ConeDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #3270 Davie Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. bardonecone@unc.edu.
Rowan A HuntDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hunna J WatsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Curtin University · AUDrexel University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Defining Remission and Recovery in Eating DisordersR01MH095860 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BARDONE-CONE, ANNA M · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review delineates issues in the conceptualization and operationalization of eating disorder recovery, highlights recent findings about recovery (since 2016), and proposes future directions. RECENT

findingsA longstanding problem in the field is that there are almost as many different definitions of recovery in eating disorders as there are studies on the topic. Yet, there has been a general shift to accepting that psychological/cognitive symptoms are important to recovery in addition to physical and behavioral indices. Further, several operationalizations of recovery have been proposed over the past two decades, and some efforts to validate operationalizations exist. However, this work has had limited impact and uptake, such that the field is suffering from "broken record syndrome," where calls are made for universal definitions time and time again. It is critical that proposed operationalizations be compared empirically to help arrive at a consensus definition and that institutional/organizational support help facilitate this. Themes in recent recovery research include identifying predictors, examining biological/neuropsychological factors, and considering severe and enduring anorexia nervosa. From qualitative research, those who have experienced eating disorders highlight recovery as a journey, as well as factors such as hope, self-acceptance, and benefiting from support from others as integral to the process of recovery. The field urgently needs to implement a universal definition of recovery that is backed by evidence, that can parsimoniously be implemented in clinical practice, and that will lead to greater harmonization of scientific findings.

Indexed as

Concept FormationAnorexia NervosaFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorHumansCourseEating disordersOutcomeRecoveryRemissionTransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID30094740
OpenAlexW2886597443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.