ArticleMycopathologia2018
Diagnosis of Superficial Mycoses by a Rapid and Effective PCR Method from Samples of Scales, Nails and Hair.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative assessment of regulated methods and PCR in the diagnosis of trichophytosis in veterinary mycology.Open veterinary journal · 2023Article
- Olorofim Effectively Eradicates DermatophytesAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Epidemiology and Diagnostic Perspectives of Dermatophytoses.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Madurella mycetomatis infection of the foot: a case report of a neglected tropical disease in a non-endemic region.BMC dermatology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Superficial mycoses are the most frequently diagnosed affections of the stratum corneum of the skin, nails and hair. It is generally caused by the presence of yeasts and dermatophytes. Onychomycosis is the most common infection with an incidence of 80-90% in Europe generally produced by Trichophyton rubrum. The aim of this study is to compare the traditional diagnostic techniques of superficial mycoses with a homemade and wide-spectrum fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that amplifies a specific region of the 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) directly from samples of scales, nails and hair. A total of 626 clinical samples (obtained in the Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain) were analysed by traditional culture, microscopy and PCR. DNA extraction was carried out by using an extraction buffer and bovine serum, and amplification of samples and performance of the PCR were checked by conventional agarose gel electrophoresis with subsequent sequencing of amplified samples. A total of 211 samples (34%) resulted in positive diagnosis with at least one of the two applied methods: culture (21%) and PCR (22%). Despite the low percentage of identification achieved by the sequencing technique (40%), the value contributed by the amplification of the 18S region of the rRNA was considered important in the identification as it showed a high predictive values for both positive and negative diagnoses (90.9% and 94.6%, respectively). The proposed PCR method has been confirmed as a complementary, rapid, and effective method in the diagnosis of superficial mycoses. Additionally, it reduces the time to obtain satisfactory results from 4 weeks to 7 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30094709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.