Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094664›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2018

Prioritizing information topics for relatives of critically ill patients : Cross-sectional survey among intensive care unit relatives and professionals.

Magdalena Hoffmann, Anna K Holl, Harald Burgsteiner, Philipp Eller, Thomas R Pieber, Karin Amrein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hand hygiene compliance in intensive care units: An observational study.International journal of nursing practice · 2020
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Magdalena HoffmannDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. magdalena.hoffmann@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-4294
Anna K HollDepartment for Psychiatry, University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria.
Harald BurgsteinerInstitute for Digital Competence and Media Education, University College of Teacher Education Styria, Graz, Austria.
Philipp EllerIntensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Thomas R PieberDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Karin AmreinDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A patient's admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) has a significant impact on family members and other relatives. In order for them to be able to cope with such a stressful situation, the availability of appropriate understandable and accessible information is crucial. The information asymmetry between relatives and medical professionals may adversely affect satisfaction of relatives and their risk of subsequent anxiety, depression and stress symptoms. The aim of this study was therefore to understand which topics are most important to the relatives of ICU patients and to quantify the perceptions of medical professionals regarding the information needs of relatives. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2015. The survey had 42 questions, such as 'diagnosis', 'treatment', 'comfort', 'family' and 'end of life'. In total, the survey was handed out to four different groups. A total of 336 persons answered the survey (26 relatives, 28 ICU physicians, 202 ICU nurses and 80 ICU medical professionals in a closed Facebook© group [Facebook, Menlo Park, California, USA]). Relatives ranked the five most important topics as follows: 'recent events (crisis)', 'my participation', 'contamination in hospital', 'physical pain', and 'probability'. Several significant differences (p<0.001) were detected, for example for the topics fever, medication, recent events (crisis), appointments, relapse, and investigations. Even the topic with the lowest ranking (religion) had a score of 3.15 (min. 1.00, max. 5.00) among relatives. The ICU professionals appear to have divergent opinions regarding the most important topics for ICU relatives as compared to relatives themselves.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCommunicationHealth literacyInformationIntensive care unitRelatives

Identifiers

PMID30094664
PMCPMC6244832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.