Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094652›Full record

ReviewMolecular imaging and biology2018

On the Usage of Brain Atlases in Neuroimaging Research.

Andreas Hess, Rukun Hinz, Georgios A Keliris, Philipp Boehm-Sturm

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular imaging and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Developmental Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anatomical variations of the dentate gyrus in normal adult brain.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas HessInstitute for Experimental Pharmacology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Fahrstraße 17, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. andreas.hess@fau.de.
Rukun HinzBio-Imaging Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Georgios A KelirisBio-Imaging Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Philipp Boehm-SturmDepartment of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. philipp.boehm-sturm@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8777-4823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain atlases play a key role in modern neuroimaging analysis of brain structure and function. We review available atlas databases for humans and animals and illustrate common state-of-the-art workflows in neuroimaging research based on image registration. Advances in noninvasive imaging methods, 3D ex vivo microscopy, and image processing are summarized which will eventually close the current resolution gap between brain atlases based on conventional 2D histology and those based on 3D in vivo imaging.

Indexed as

Anatomy, ArtisticAtlases as TopicBiomedical ResearchNeuroimagingAnimalsBrainHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicBrain atlasImage registrationNeuroimagingVasculature

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.