Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094651›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2018

Multi-Modality Imaging in the Evaluation and Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Samuel M Kim, Harsimran S Singh, Jillian Nati, Jonathan N Ginns

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel M KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, 520 E 70th St, Starr 4, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Harsimran S SinghDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, 520 E 70th St, Starr 4, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jillian NatiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, 520 E 70th St, Starr 4, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jonathan N GinnsDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, 520 E 70th St, Starr 4, New York, NY, 10021, USA. jog9097@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe goal of this review is to cover the epidemiology of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), anatomy of the tricuspid valve (TV), and the mechanisms and modern treatment of TR. The focus will be on the role of echocardiography, cardiac CT, and MRI to determine the mechanism, severity, and management strategies of TR. RECENT

findingsThe evaluation and management of TR is a rapidly growing field with significant advances in both imaging and interventions. Important advances have been made to understand TV anatomy and physiology in 3D echo, CT, and MRI. Additional understanding of the abnormal outcomes in both primary TR and secondary TR have been appreciated. Multiple transcatheter devices have reached the stage of early trials in high surgical risk cohorts with favorable initial findings. TR is a significant cardiovascular problem and vastly undertreated in the present era. There has been tremendous growth in knowledge of mechanisms of TR, its prognostic implications, timing of intervention, and development of novel treatment strategies. Multimodality imaging plays a key role in evaluation and treatment of this condition.

Indexed as

Multi-modality imagingTranscatheter interventionTricuspid regurgitationTricuspid valveValvular heart disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.