ArticleInsights into imaging2018
Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 181 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of deep learning technology in breast cancer: a systematic review of segmentation, detection, and classification approaches.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- ESR Essentials: diagnostic work-up in patients with symptomatic breast disease-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging.European radiology · 2025Guideline
- ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI.European radiology · 2024Guideline
- Breast imaging and cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM.La Radiologia medica · 2020Guideline
- Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2020Pooled it
- The Value of Ultrasound in Patients with T1-T2 Breast Cancer with No Palpable Lymph Nodes Enrolled in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Letter to the Editor: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy vs core needle biopsy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Article
- The underestimated risk of additional ipsilateral BI-RADS 3 lesions identified by preoperative ultrasound in breast cancer patients.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- DynamicBUS: restoring temporal dynamics from static ultrasound for improved breast cancer diagnosis.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- A deep learning system for non-invasive breast cancer diagnosis with multimodal data.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Utilizing post-imaging surveys to guide development of photoacoustic computed technology for breast imaging.American journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- A Multimodal Ultrasound-Driven Approach for Automated Tumor Assessment With B-Mode and Multi-Frequency Harmonic Motion Images.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Application of YOLO-v7 and YOLO-v8 Transfer Learning Models in Breast Lesion Classification and DiagnosisCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Correlation between ultrasonography and elastography parameters and molecular subtypes of breast cancer in young women.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- XBusNet: Text-Guided Breast Ultrasound Segmentation via Multimodal Vision-Language Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring potent miRNA combinations for detecting early-stage breast cancer.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Feasibility of tumor detection with a transmission-based microwave imaging system.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Ultrasound Based Viscoelasticity Imaging Tool for Differentiation of Breast Lesions.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 16 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This article summarises the information that should be provided to women and referring physicians about breast ultrasound (US). After explaining the physical principles, technical procedure and safety of US, information is given about its ability to make a correct diagnosis, depending on the setting in which it is applied. The following definite indications for breast US in female subjects are proposed: palpable lump; axillary adenopathy; first diagnostic approach for clinical abnormalities under 40 and in pregnant or lactating women; suspicious abnormalities at mammography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); suspicious nipple discharge; recent nipple inversion; skin retraction; breast inflammation; abnormalities in the area of the surgical scar after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy; abnormalities in the presence of breast implants; screening high-risk women, especially when MRI is not performed; loco-regional staging of a known breast cancer, when MRI is not performed; guidance for percutaneous interventions (needle biopsy, pre-surgical localisation, fluid collection drainage); monitoring patients with breast cancer receiving neo-adjuvant therapy, when MRI is not performed. Possible indications such as supplemental screening after mammography for women aged 40-74 with dense breasts are also listed. Moreover, inappropriate indications include screening for breast cancer as a stand-alone alternative to mammography. The structure and organisation of the breast US report and of classification systems such as the BI-RADS and consequent management recommendations are illustrated. Information about additional or new US technologies (colour-Doppler, elastography, and automated whole breast US) is also provided. Finally, five frequently asked questions are answered. TEACHING POINTS: • US is an established tool for suspected cancers at all ages and also the method of choice under 40. • For US-visible suspicious lesions, US-guided biopsy is preferred, even for palpable findings. • High-risk women can be screened with US, especially when MRI cannot be performed. • Supplemental US increases cancer detection but also false positives, biopsy rate and follow-up exams. • Breast US is inappropriate as a stand-alone screening method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.