Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094367›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2018

A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel neuromuscular electro-stimulation device in preventing the formation of oedema following total hip replacement surgery.

Thomas W Wainwright, Louise C Burgess, Robert G Middleton

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04700735 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Cross Therapy Registry - Edema Post Market Clinical Follow-up of Safety and Patient Outcomes for Subjects Undergoing Peroneal Nerve Stimulation by Geko™.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFirstkind LtdRan2021 to 2023Enrolled83ConditionsEdema LegArmsgeko Neuromuscular Electro Stimulator (NMES)
NCT04704557 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Cross Therapy Registry - Oedema Post Market Clinical Follow-up of Safety and Patient Outcomes for Subjects Undergoing Peroneal Nerve Stimulation by Geko™. CTR-Oedema-EU

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFirstkind LtdRan2021 to 2021Enrolled35ConditionsEdema LegArmsgeko Neuromuscular Electro Stimulator (NMES)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas W WainwrightOrthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth University, 6th Floor, Executive Business Centre, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth, BH8 8EB, UK.
Louise C BurgessOrthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth University, 6th Floor, Executive Business Centre, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth, BH8 8EB, UK.
Robert G MiddletonOrthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth University, 6th Floor, Executive Business Centre, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth, BH8 8EB, UK.
Orthopaedic Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this feasibility study was to investigate the potential role of a novel neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device in preventing the formation of oedema following total hip replacement (THR).

methodsSuccessive primary THR patients were recruited into a randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomised to wear either the NMES device or compression stockings continually from post-surgery until discharge.The main outcome measure was presence of lower limb oedema, assessed by taking measurements of the circumference of the ankle, knee and thigh on the operated leg and non-operated leg, pre-operatively, post-operatively, at two days post-operatively and every day until discharge. Secondary objectives were to compare adverse events, the presence of asymptomatic and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and device tolerability between groups.

resultsData from 40 participants were analysed (NMES (n = 20), compression stockings (n = 20)). The NMES group had significantly less oedema and the device was found to be tolerable and safe.

conclusionThe results of this study suggest that the NMES is a safe and well tolerated alternative to compression stockings, which should be considered by clinicians seeking the additional benefit of reducing post-operative oedema. In addition the NMES device should be considered as part of a DVT prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Biomedical engineeringPhysiologyRehabilitationSurgery

Identifiers

PMID30094367
PMCPMC6072917
OpenAlexW2883181330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.