Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094286›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2018

Generation and Implementation of a Patient-Centered and Patient-Facing Genomic Test Report in the EHR.

Jessica M Goehringer, Michele A Bonhag, Laney K Jones, Tara Schmidlen, Marci Schwartz, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Janet L Williams, Marc S Williams

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Counseling, Personalized Medicine, and Precision Health.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica M GoehringerGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, US.
Michele A BonhagPatient Co-investigator, Chase Group, Ltd, Traverse, Michigan, US.
Laney K JonesCenter for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA, US.
Tara SchmidlenGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, US.
Marci SchwartzGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, US.
Alanna Kulchak RahmGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, US.
Janet L WilliamsGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, US.
Marc S WilliamsGenomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCommunication of genetic laboratory results to patients and providers is impeded by the complexity of results and reports. This can lead to misinterpretation of results, causing inappropriate care. Patients often do not receive a copy of the report leading to possible miscommunication. To address these problems, we conducted patient-centered research to inform design of interpretive reports. Here we describe the development and deployment of a specific patient-centered clinical decision support (CDS) tool, a multi-use patient-centered genomic test report (PGR) that interfaces with an electronic health record (EHR). IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: A PGR with a companion provider report was configured for implementation within the EHR using locally developed software (COMPASS™) to manage secure data exchange and access.

findingsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, and clinicians that showed they sought clear information addressing findings, family implications, resources, prognosis and next steps relative to the genomic result. Providers requested access to applicable, available clinical guidelines. Initial results indicated patients and providers found the PGR contained helpful, valuable information and would provide a basis for result-related conversation between patients, providers and family. MAJOR THEMES: Direct patient involvement in the design and development of a PGR identified format and presentation preferences, and delivery of relevant information to patients and providers, prompting the creation of a CDS tool.

conclusionsResearch and development of patient-centered CDS tools designed to support improved patient outcomes, are enhanced by early and substantial engagement of patients in contributing to all phases of tool design and development.

Indexed as

communicationelectronic health recordsgenomicspatient access to recordspatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID30094286
PMCPMC6078113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.