Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094284›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2018

The Imperative for Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support.

Laura Haak Marcial, Joshua E Richardson, Beth Lasater, Blackford Middleton, Jerome A Osheroff, Kensaku Kawamoto, Jessica S Ancker, Danny van Leeuwen, Edwin A Lomotan, Shafa Al-Showk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The technical landscape for patient-centered CDS: progress, gaps, and challenges.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Preferences of gastric cancer survivors for follow-up care-a multicenter discrete choice experiment study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Meta-Decision in Healthcare.Frontiers in public health · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura Haak MarcialRTI International, US.ORCID 0000-0003-2277-5723
Joshua E RichardsonRTI International, US.
Beth LasaterRTI International, US.
Blackford MiddletonApervita, US.
Jerome A OsheroffTMIT Consulting, US.
Kensaku KawamotoUniversity of Utah, US.
Jessica S AnckerWeill Cornell Medical College, US.
Danny van LeeuwenHealth Hats, US.
Edwin A LomotanAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US.
Shafa Al-ShowkAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US.
Barry H BlumenfeldRTI International, US.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Clinical Decision Support Learning Network (PCOR CDS-LN)U18HS024849 · AHRQ · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI BLUMENFELD, BARRY H · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS U18 HS024849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary introduces the Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support (PCCDS) Learning Network, which is collaborating with AcademyHealth to publish "Better Decisions Together" as part of

Indexed as

clinical decision support (CDS)learning networkpatient-centered clinical decision support learning network (PCCDS Learning Network)patient-centered clinical decision support (PCCDS)

Identifiers

PMID30094284
PMCPMC6078148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.