Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094283›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2018

A Query Workflow Design to Perform Automatable Distributed Regression Analysis in Large Distributed Data Networks.

Qoua L Her, Jessica M Malenfant, Sarah Malek, Yury Vilk, Jessica Young, Lingling Li, Jeffery Brown, Sengwee Toh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting Adverse Drug Reactions on Distributed Health Data using Federated Learning.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qoua L HerDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.ORCID 0000-0002-6427-1032
Jessica M MalenfantDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Sarah MalekDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Yury VilkDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Jessica YoungDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Lingling LiDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Jeffery BrownDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Sengwee TohDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, US.
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient privacy and data security concerns often limit the feasibility of pooling patient-level data from multiple sources for analysis. Distributed data networks (DDNs) that employ privacy-protecting analytical methods, such as distributed regression analysis (DRA), can mitigate these concerns. However, DRA is not routinely implemented in large DDNs.

objectiveWe describe the design and implementation of a process framework and query workflow that allow automatable DRA in real-world DDNs that use PopMedNet™, an open-source distributed networking software platform.

methodsWe surveyed and catalogued existing hardware and software configurations at all data partners in the Sentinel System, a PopMedNet-driven DDN. Key guiding principles for the design included minimal disruptions to the current PopMedNet query workflow and minimal modifications to data partners' hardware configurations and software requirements.

resultsWe developed and implemented a three-step process framework and PopMedNet query workflow that enables automatable DRA: 1) assembling a de-identified patient-level dataset at each data partner, 2) distributing a DRA package to data partners for local iterative analysis, and 3) iteratively transferring intermediate files between data partners and analysis center. The DRA query workflow is agnostic to statistical software, accommodates different regression models, and allows different levels of user-specified automation. DISCUSSION: The process framework can be generalized to and the query workflow can be adopted by other PopMedNet-based DDNs.

conclusionDRA has great potential to change the paradigm of data analysis in DDNs. Successful implementation of DRA in Sentinel will facilitate adoption of the analytic approach in other DDNs.

Indexed as

Distributed data networksDistributed regressionPharmacoepidemiologyPopMedNet™Privacy-protecting methodsSentinel

Identifiers

PMID30094283
PMCPMC6078121
OpenAlexW2804088825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.