ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2018
Comparing imaging capabilities of spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy subjects and central serous retinopathy.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal and choroidal microvascular analysis by swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) and hyperthyroidism without clinical signs of TAO.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Macular vascular density changes in different stages of chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma: current status and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Comparative study between swept-source and spectral-domain OCTA for imaging of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Undetectable Macular Neovascularization on OCT Angiography in Age Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Different Devices.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Superficial macular vessel density in eyes with mild, moderate, and severe primary open-angle glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Article
- Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography alleviates shadowing artifacts caused by subretinal fluid.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- A Novel Automatic Method to Estimate Visual Acuity and Analyze the Retinal Vasculature in Retinal Vein Occlusion Using Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Measurement of Oral Epithelial Thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are two forms of system implementation of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in ophthalmic imaging, i.e., spectral domain (SD-) and swept source OCTA (SS-OCTA). The purpose of this paper is to compare the SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA for elucidating structural and vascular features associated with central serous retinopathy (CSR), and to evaluate the effects of CSR on SD- and SS-OCTA's imaging capabilities.
methodsNormal subjects and CSR patients were imaged by SD- and SS-OCTA using 3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm scan patterns. OCT signal strengths at the superficial retina, deep retina, Sattler's layer and Haller's layer were used to compare the ability of SD- and SS-OCTA to image structural features. In addition, the ability to acquire angiograms were discussed by evaluating retinal vessel density. Central serous volume (CSV) was measured and it was correlated with difference in signal strengths (∆S) between two OCTA devices.
resultsSeven normal eyes and seven diseased eyes were recruited. Results showed no significant differences between SD- and SS-OCT in detecting structural features of the retinal layer according to the paired t-test. However, when imaging the Sattler's layer for normal eyes, a significant difference is found between SD- and SS-OCT (
conclusionsThe results suggest no differences between SD- and SS-OCTA for imaging the retinal layers however, when imaging beyond retinal layers, SS-OCTA appears advantageous in detecting returning signals. In CSR cases, the CSV may have an impact on sub-CSR tissue imaging and appears to have more impact on SD- than SS-OCTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.