Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094079›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2018

Agronomic efficiency of NBPT as a urease inhibitor: A review.

Heitor Cantarella, Rafael Otto, Johnny Rodrigues Soares, Aijânio Gomes de Brito Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Urease Inhibitors fromACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heitor CantarellaSoils and Environmental Resources Center, Agronomic Institute of Campinas, Avenida Barao de Itapura 1481, 13020-902 Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Rafael Otto"Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Padua Dias 11, 13418-900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Johnny Rodrigues SoaresSchool of Agricultural Engineering, University of Campinas, Av. Cândido Rondon, 501, 13083-875 Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Aijânio Gomes de Brito Silva"Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Padua Dias 11, 13418-900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urea is the most widely used nitrogen (N) fertilizer, with a projected increase in annual demand of 1.5% in the coming years. After its application to soil, urea undergoes hydrolysis via the urease enzyme, causing increases in the soil pH in the surrounding area of the granules and resulting in NH

Indexed as

Ammonia volatilizationNBPTNitrogen fertilizerNPPTNutrient use efficiencySoil ureaseUrea

Identifiers

PMID30094079
PMCPMC6077139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.