Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094073›Full record

ArticleESMO open2018

Phase I, open-label study of pasireotide in patients with

Reinhard Dummer, Olivier Michielin, Mirjam Chantal Nägeli, Simone M Goldinger, Federico Campigotto, Ulrike Kriemler-Krahn, Herbert Schmid, Alberto Pedroncelli, Sara Micaletto, Dirk Schadendorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reinhard DummerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: reinhard.dummer@usz.ch.
Olivier MichielinMultidisciplinary Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mirjam Chantal NägeliDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simone M GoldingerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Federico CampigottoGlobal Medical Affairs, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Ulrike Kriemler-KrahnClinical Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Herbert SchmidClinical Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Alberto PedroncelliClinical Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Sara MicalettoDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSomatostatin analogues exert antitumour activity via direct and indirect mechanisms. The present study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of pasireotide in patients with PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with unresectable and/or metastatic melanoma or Merkel cell carcinoma were eligible. Pasireotide was administered at different doses for ≤8 weeks in dose-escalation phase, followed by long-acting pasireotide 80 mg or lower dose in case of toxicity in follow-up phase up to six additional months. Primary endpoint was safety in the first 8 weeks of dose-escalation phase.

resultsThe study was terminated early due to slow recruitment. Of the 10 patients with metastatic melanoma enrolled, only four reached the high dose level: two patients reached 3600 µg in dose-escalation and follow-up phases and two patients reached 3600 µg in dose-escalation and long-acting pasireotide 80 mg in follow-up phases and were stable for >5 months. Most common adverse events (AEs) during dose-escalation phase in ≥2 patients (20%) were: diarrhoea (50%), nausea (50%), fatigue (20%), hyperglycaemia (20%), hypophosphatemia (20%), chills (20%) and tumour pain (20%). Grade 3 or 4 study drug-related AEs were diarrhoea and nausea, reported in one patient. Partial response was documented in one patient and stable disease in another.

conclusionsPasireotide was well tolerated, and safety results were similar to those previously reported in other indications. Further studies are needed to evaluate its antitumour activity alone and in combination with other drugs in melanoma.

Indexed as

braf- and nras-wild typeinsulin-like growth factor-1MAPKmetastatic melanomapasireotide

Identifiers

PMID30094073
PMCPMC6069912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.