Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094071›Full record

ArticleESMO open2018

Challenge of implementing clinical practice guidelines. Getting ESMO's guidelines even closer to the bedside: introducing the ESMO Practising Oncologists' checklists and knowledge and practice questions.

Stefan Rauh, Dirk Arnold, Sofia Braga, Razvan Curca, Robert Eckert, Ana Fröbe, Michalis Karamouzis, Gabor Lakatos, Jean-Luc Molitor

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Patient Safety: A Deep Concern to Caregivers.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefan RauhDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Hospital Center Emile Mayrisch, Esch/Alzette, Luxembourg. Electronic address: stefanrauh1964@gmail.com.
Dirk ArnoldAsklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany; Oncologia, Instituto CUF de Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sofia BragaOncologia, Instituto CUF de Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal.
Razvan CurcaMedical Oncology, Emergency County Hospital, Alba Iulia, Romania.
Robert EckertHämato Onkologie, Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Esslingen, Germany.
Ana FröbeDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Michalis KaramouzisDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Chaidari-Athens, Athens, Greece.
Gabor LakatosOncology, Magyar Klinikai Onkologiai Tarsasag, Budapest, Hungary.
Jean-Luc MolitorOncologie Médicale, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ESMO checklistguidelines implementationquality of care

Identifiers

PMID30094071
PMCPMC6069906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.