Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30094069›Full record

ArticleESMO open2018

PHOTOSTENT-02: porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy plus stenting versus stenting alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.

Stephen P Pereira, Mark Jitlal, Marian Duggan, Emma Lawrie, Sandy Beare, Pam O'Donoghue, Harpreet S Wasan, Juan W Valle, John Bridgewater, John Ramage and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  6. Progress toward improving outcomes in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ablative therapies of the biliary tree.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen P PereiraThe UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: stephen.pereira@ucl.ac.uk.
Mark JitlalCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Marian DugganCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Emma LawrieCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Sandy BeareCancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Pam O'DonoghueRoyal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Harpreet S WasanHammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Health Care Trust, London, UK.
Juan W ValleManchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
John BridgewaterUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
John Ramage
Robert Przemioslo
Richard Hammonds
Guru Aithal
Frank Murphy
Graham Foster
Richard Sturgess
University College London · GBCancer Research UK · GBLondon Cancer · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Small Molecule Enhancers of Photodynamic Therapy for Skin CancerP01CA084203 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Brian William Pogue · 2001 to 2026
$27.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA084203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndobiliary stenting is standard practice for palliation of obstructive jaundice due to biliary tract cancer (BTC). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) may also improve biliary drainage and previous small studies suggested survival benefit.

aimsTo assess the difference in outcome between patients with BTC undergoing palliative stenting plus PDT versus stenting alone.

methods92 patients with confirmed locally advanced or metastatic BTC, ECOG performance status 0-3 and adequate biliary drainage were randomised (46 per group) to receive porfimer sodium PDT plus stenting or stenting alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. Treatment arms were well balanced for baseline factors and prior therapy.

resultsNo significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicities and no grade 3-4 adverse events due to PDT were observed. Thirteen (28%) PDT patients and 24 (52%) stent alone patients received subsequent palliative chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 8.4 months, OS and PFS were worse in patients receiving PDT compared with stent alone group (OS median 6.2 vs 9.8 months (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.43, p=0.048) and PFS median 3.4 vs 4.3 months (HR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.93 to 2.18, p=0.10), respectively).

conclusionIn patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC, PDT was associated with worse outcome than stenting alone, explained only in part by the differences in chemotherapy treatments. We conclude that optimal stenting remains the treatment of choice for malignant biliary obstruction and the use of PDT for this indication cannot be recommended outside of clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 87712758; EudraCT 2005-001173-96; UKCRN ID: 1461.

Indexed as

cholangiocarcinomagallbladderphotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID30094069
PMCPMC6069917
OpenAlexW2895195177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.