ArticleESMO open2018
PHOTOSTENT-02: porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy plus stenting versus stenting alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.
Article in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endobiliary Photodynamic Therapy in Cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical Outcomes, Patient Selection, and Procedural Context.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Photochemical Internalization of Gemcitabine Is Safe and Effective in Locally Advanced Inoperable Cholangiocarcinoma.The oncologist · 2022Article
- Comparing palliative treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation.Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
- SpyGlass-Guided Photodynamic Therapy for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Progress toward improving outcomes in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Percutaneous Intraductal Microwave Ablation and Self-expandable Metallic Stenting: A New Treatment Method for Malignant Extrahepatic Biliary Obstruction.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Article
- Ablative therapies of the biliary tree.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021Review
- Article
- Two cases of bile duct carcinoma patients who underwent the photodynamic therapy using talaporfin sodium (LaserphyrinClinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation Prolongs Survival of Patients with Unresectable Hilar Cholangiocellular Carcinoma - A Case-Control Study.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Endoscopic Palliation for Biliary and Pancreatic Malignancies: Recent Advances.Clinical endoscopy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndobiliary stenting is standard practice for palliation of obstructive jaundice due to biliary tract cancer (BTC). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) may also improve biliary drainage and previous small studies suggested survival benefit.
aimsTo assess the difference in outcome between patients with BTC undergoing palliative stenting plus PDT versus stenting alone.
methods92 patients with confirmed locally advanced or metastatic BTC, ECOG performance status 0-3 and adequate biliary drainage were randomised (46 per group) to receive porfimer sodium PDT plus stenting or stenting alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. Treatment arms were well balanced for baseline factors and prior therapy.
resultsNo significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicities and no grade 3-4 adverse events due to PDT were observed. Thirteen (28%) PDT patients and 24 (52%) stent alone patients received subsequent palliative chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 8.4 months, OS and PFS were worse in patients receiving PDT compared with stent alone group (OS median 6.2 vs 9.8 months (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.43, p=0.048) and PFS median 3.4 vs 4.3 months (HR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.93 to 2.18, p=0.10), respectively).
conclusionIn patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC, PDT was associated with worse outcome than stenting alone, explained only in part by the differences in chemotherapy treatments. We conclude that optimal stenting remains the treatment of choice for malignant biliary obstruction and the use of PDT for this indication cannot be recommended outside of clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 87712758; EudraCT 2005-001173-96; UKCRN ID: 1461.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.