ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2018
Cell-free DNA in blood and urine as a diagnostic tool for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid biopsy in genitourinary cancers: Diagnostic and prognostic implications.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Advances in Liquid Biopsy for Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.International neurourology journal · 2024Article
- Depth of invasion to the bladder wall as a prognostic factor and its association with circulating cell-free DNA levels in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Current urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the diagnostic performance of cell-free DNA assays in the detection of bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe quality of the studies included in this meta-analysis was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analyses were performed using the software RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0. We assessed the pooled sensitivity and specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios (PLRs/NLRs), diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Summary receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize the overall test performance. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also examined.
resultsEleven studies included 802 bladder cancer patients and 668 controls met the eligibility criteria. The overall diagnostic accuracy was measured as follows: sensitivity 0.71 (95% CI = 0.64-0.77), specificity 0.78 (95% CI = 0.70-0.85), PLR 3.3 (95% CI = 2.4-54.5), NLR 0.37 (95% CI = 0.30-0.46), DOR 9 (95% CI = 6-14), and AUC 0.80 (95% CI = 0.77-0.83). Subgroup analysis suggested that ethnicity significantly accounted for the heterogeneity of specificity. The Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (
conclusionsCell-free DNA has a high diagnostic value in bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30093933PMC6079140W2983153495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.