Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30093901›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Mass Cytometry for the Assessment of Immune Reconstitution After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Lauren Stern, Helen McGuire, Selmir Avdic, Simone Rizzetto, Barbara Fazekas de St Groth, Fabio Luciani, Barry Slobedman, Emily Blyth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Applications of Flow Cytometry in Drug Discovery and Translational Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren SternUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Helen McGuireUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Selmir AvdicUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Simone RizzettoUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Barbara Fazekas de St GrothUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fabio LucianiKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Barry SlobedmanUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emily BlythUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWestmead Institute for Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass cytometry, or Cytometry by Time-Of-Flight, is a powerful new platform for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of the immune system. It enables the simultaneous measurement of over 40 markers on individual cells through the use of monoclonal antibodies conjugated to rare-earth heavy-metal isotopes. In contrast to the fluorochromes used in conventional flow cytometry, metal isotopes display minimal signal overlap when resolved by single-cell mass spectrometry. This review focuses on the potential of mass cytometry as a novel technology for studying immune reconstitution in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Reconstitution of a healthy donor-derived immune system after HSCT involves the coordinated regeneration of innate and adaptive immune cell subsets in the recipient. Mass cytometry presents an opportunity to investigate immune reconstitution post-HSCT from a systems-level perspective, by allowing the phenotypic and functional features of multiple cell populations to be assessed simultaneously. This review explores the current knowledge of immune reconstitution in HSCT recipients and highlights recent mass cytometry studies contributing to the field.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryImmune ReconstitutionAnimalsGraft SurvivalHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunophenotypingCyTOFcytometry by time-of-flighthematopoietic stem cell transplantationHSCTimmune reconstitutionmass cytometry

Identifiers

PMID30093901
PMCPMC6070614
OpenAlexW2876959260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.