Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30093737›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2018

Nonparametric Adjustment for Measurement Error in Time-to-Event Data: Application to Risk Prediction Models.

Danielle Braun, Malka Gorfine, Hormuzd A Katki, Argyrios Ziogas, Giovanni Parmigiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PREDICTION OF HEREDITARY CANCERS USING NEURAL NETWORKS.The annals of applied statistics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle BraunDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Avenue, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.
Malka GorfineDepartment of Statistics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 6997801.
Hormuzd A KatkiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NCI Shady Grove, Room 7E606, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850.
Argyrios ZiogasDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697.
Giovanni ParmigianiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Avenue, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.

Funding

Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismeasured time to event data used as a predictor in risk prediction models will lead to inaccurate predictions. This arises in the context of self-reported family history, a time to event predictor often measured with error, used in Mendelian risk prediction models. Using validation data, we propose a method to adjust for this type of error. We estimate the measurement error process using a nonparametric smoothed Kaplan-Meier estimator, and use Monte Carlo integration to implement the adjustment. We apply our method to simulated data in the context of both Mendelian and multivariate survival prediction models. Simulations are evaluated using measures of mean squared error of prediction (MSEP), area under the response operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), and the ratio of observed to expected number of events. These results show that our method mitigates the effects of measurement error mainly by improving calibration and total accuracy. We illustrate our method in the context of Mendelian risk prediction models focusing on misreporting of breast cancer, fitting the measurement error model on data from the University of California at Irvine, and applying our method to counselees from the Cancer Genetics Network. We show that our method improves overall calibration, especially in low risk deciles.

Indexed as

Carrier Status PredictionFamily HistoryMismeasured CovariatesSmoothed Kaplan-Meier EstimatorSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30093737
PMCPMC6077989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.